BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 45(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,317Mumbai2,197Bangalore928Chennai482Ahmedabad444Kolkata396Karnataka364Hyderabad344Jaipur297Pune221Chandigarh193Indore171Cochin131Surat117Rajkot74Visakhapatnam63Calcutta57Telangana47SC46Raipur39Nagpur37Cuttack34Lucknow33Amritsar26Guwahati25Jodhpur18Agra11Ranchi10Rajasthan8Kerala7Varanasi6Dehradun6Jabalpur6Allahabad5Orissa5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Panaji2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1DIPAK MISRA V. GOPALA GOWDA1

Key Topics

Section 80I18Section 54B7Section 806Deduction4Section 143(3)3Section 8013Section 8O3Business Income3Section 144C(5)2

B G EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, DDIT/ ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-1, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN, UTTARAKHAND

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 13/DDN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharatdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Mayak Kumar, JCIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.219,44,33,564 in total towards international transactions pertaining to payment of management service and unit charges, IM charges and payroll expenses to its AE. Ground No. 3: Erroneous rejection of Transactional Net Margin Method ("TNMM") and selection of Comparable Uncontrolled Price ("CUP") Method 3.1 The learned TPO / AO / DRP / have erred

B G EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME, DDIT/ ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-1, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

Transfer Pricing2
Reassessment2
Reopening of Assessment2

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 47/DDN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharatdr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Mayak Kumar, JCIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.219,44,33,564 in total towards international transactions pertaining to payment of management service and unit charges, IM charges and payroll expenses to its AE. Ground No. 3: Erroneous rejection of Transactional Net Margin Method ("TNMM") and selection of Comparable Uncontrolled Price ("CUP") Method 3.1 The learned TPO / AO / DRP / have erred

ITO, WARD- 2(4), DEHRADUN vs. STATE INFRASTRUCTURE & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF UTTARAKHAND LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4200/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

Section 80Section 801Section 80ISection 8O

3. The assessee electronically filed its Return for A.Y. 2011-12 on 30.09.2011 declaring income of Rs.21,45,12,620/-.The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iii) of the I.T. Act amounting to Rs.15,79,11,665/- in respect of the units developed at Pant Nagar Industrial Estate, District- Rudrapur, Uttarakhand and BHEL, near Ranipur, Haridwar. 4. During

ITO, WARD- 2(4), DEHRADUN vs. STATE INFRASTRUCTURE & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF UTTARAKHAND LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4201/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

Section 80Section 801Section 80ISection 8O

3. The assessee electronically filed its Return for A.Y. 2011-12 on 30.09.2011 declaring income of Rs.21,45,12,620/-.The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iii) of the I.T. Act amounting to Rs.15,79,11,665/- in respect of the units developed at Pant Nagar Industrial Estate, District- Rudrapur, Uttarakhand and BHEL, near Ranipur, Haridwar. 4. During

ITO, WARD- 2(4), DEHRADUN vs. STATE INFRASTRUCTURE & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF UTTARAKHAND LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4202/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us

Section 80Section 801Section 80ISection 8O

3. The assessee electronically filed its Return for A.Y. 2011-12 on 30.09.2011 declaring income of Rs.21,45,12,620/-.The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iii) of the I.T. Act amounting to Rs.15,79,11,665/- in respect of the units developed at Pant Nagar Industrial Estate, District- Rudrapur, Uttarakhand and BHEL, near Ranipur, Haridwar. 4. During

SH. DEVENDRA DUTT PANT,HARIDWAR vs. DCIT , UTTARKAHAND

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 149/DDN/2025[2106-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2106-2017

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 54BSection 54E

price at which the land was sold and whether the owner would have ever sold the land valuing it as a property yielding agricultural produce on the basis of its yield? At the risk of repetition, we may mention that not all of these factors would be present or absent in any case and that in each case