AKRAM,ROORKEE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, HARIDWAR
Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms
ITA 6373/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun07 Jan 2025AY 2009-10
Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Naveen Chandra
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Mayank Kumar, Addl. CIT DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148
250/-(5245 sq. mtr.)
Rao Mohammad Akram iii. ½ share of assessee Mohd. Rs.57,65,625/-(2622.5 sq. mtr.)
Akram iv. Profit earned
Rs. 57,65,625/-
8. As already pointed no compliance has been made to the various opportunities for hearing that have been afforded to the assessee during the course of appeal.
In the circumstances, the merits
