RAJESH AGGARWAL ,DEHRADUN vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

33. Where the law has declared that all the provisions of the Income-tax Act will apply to the returns filed by an assessee in response to a notice issued by the Assessing Officer under section 153A as if such return filed by the assessee was a return filed under section 139(1), there cannot be a dash

DEPUTY COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN vs. KAMAL JEWELLERS, DEHRADUN

In the result, Appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us & Sh. Manish Agarwal

33,383/- and the said turnover has been accepted by the order of DC, VAT dated 25.01.2020. 4. The books of accounts have been accepted by the AO and the AO has not tinkered with the purchase; sale & trading results shown by the assessee. 5. All the sales were recorded in the books of accounts which were audited

SUNIL SRIVASTAVA,HALDWANI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(3), HALDWANI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Him From Time To Time

33,06,589/- stated by the assessee as above. The assessee filed a written reply dated 30.11.2018 that the Sunil Srivastava vs. ITO debit entry of Rs 10 lakhs on 02.11.2015 was against the payment made by the assessee on request of and on behalf of M/s Bodega Alcobebv and Mr Vijayant Jaiswal to M/s Parvatiya Mines. In support

AJAY KUMAR MAMGAIN,RISHIKESH vs. ITO, WARD-1(4)(1), RISHIKESH

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

68 of Rs 11 lakhs. 2. Brief facts of the case shows that assessee is an individual who filed his return of income on 31-3- 2016 declaring an income of ₹ 3 74340/–. Action under section 147 of the income tax act was initiated and the notice under section 148 was issued on 24/3/2017. In response to that

ACIT, MEERUT vs. SHRI SACHIN UPADHAYA, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Dr. B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2007-08

section 68 of the act. 8.2 Before the first appellate authority, the assessee furnished date wise details of the transaction and submitted that substantial sum of money was withdrawn in cash from his bank account. Further explaining, the assessee submitted that the cash was withdrawn as the assessee was in the process of buying

DCIT, CIRCLE- 2, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for the Asst Year 2015-16 is partly allowed and that of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshita No. 5223/Del/2018 (A. Y.: 2015-16) Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 14Th Floor, Tower-C, Building Circle-2, No. 1, Dlf City, Phase-Ii, International Taxation, Gurgaon Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aadcs1107J

33,89,023/-) and completed the assessment. The ld. AO further observed that the following receipts were not considered as part of gross contractual receipts by the assessee :- a) Service tax receipts amounting to Rs 241,32,45,767/- b) Lost in Hole amounting to Rs 80,68,19,422/- c) Reimbursement amounting

SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD.,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for the Asst Year 2015-16 is partly allowed and that of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshita No. 5223/Del/2018 (A. Y.: 2015-16) Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 14Th Floor, Tower-C, Building Circle-2, No. 1, Dlf City, Phase-Ii, International Taxation, Gurgaon Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aadcs1107J

33,89,023/-) and completed the assessment. The ld. AO further observed that the following receipts were not considered as part of gross contractual receipts by the assessee :- a) Service tax receipts amounting to Rs 241,32,45,767/- b) Lost in Hole amounting to Rs 80,68,19,422/- c) Reimbursement amounting

DCIT, CIRCLE- 2, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for the Asst Year 2015-16 is partly allowed and that of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshita No. 5223/Del/2018 (A. Y.: 2015-16) Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 14Th Floor, Tower-C, Building Circle-2, No. 1, Dlf City, Phase-Ii, International Taxation, Gurgaon Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aadcs1107J

33,89,023/-) and completed the assessment. The ld. AO further observed that the following receipts were not considered as part of gross contractual receipts by the assessee :- a) Service tax receipts amounting to Rs 241,32,45,767/- b) Lost in Hole amounting to Rs 80,68,19,422/- c) Reimbursement amounting

SCHLUMBERGER ASIA SERVICES LTD.,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 2, INTL. TAXATION, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for the Asst Year 2015-16 is partly allowed and that of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshita No. 5223/Del/2018 (A. Y.: 2015-16) Schlumberger Asia Services Ltd, Vs. Dcit, 14Th Floor, Tower-C, Building Circle-2, No. 1, Dlf City, Phase-Ii, International Taxation, Gurgaon Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aadcs1107J

33,89,023/-) and completed the assessment. The ld. AO further observed that the following receipts were not considered as part of gross contractual receipts by the assessee :- a) Service tax receipts amounting to Rs 241,32,45,767/- b) Lost in Hole amounting to Rs 80,68,19,422/- c) Reimbursement amounting

INTECSEA ASIA PACIFIC SDN BHD,MALAYSIA vs. ACIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE- 1, DEHRADUN

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarasstt. Year : 2015-16 Intecsea Asia Pacific N Vs. Acit, International Bhd Taxation, Circle-1, Kpmg Salarpuria Knowledge Dehradun City, Orwell Unit 3, 6Th Floor Sy. No. 83/2, Plot 2, Raidurg, Hyderabad 500081 (Appellant) (Respondent)

33 of the table inserted in the ONGC Ltd case (supra) that the purpose of the services given by the appellant is squarely covered with the scope of work involved in the contracts examined by the Honble Supreme court in the above said order. The services provided by the Appellant were very much in connection with exploration of mineral

BG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DDIT/ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ) CIRCLE-1, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri V.P. Raoassessment Years: 2016-17

33. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of the lower authorities and materials available on record. We fail to see any such provision in the act that if the other party in the joint-venture do not agree to share the particular cost, the cost incurred by one of the partners of that joint-venture becomes

BG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DDIT/ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE -1, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

68,11,169. However, the disallowances totaling to Rs. 2,12,426 have been suo-moto made by the assessee. Therefore, to prevent double addition, the difference of Rs. 8,65,98,743 was added by the AO to the total income. The AO proposed to disallow the expenses by alleging that since the said expenses had been incurred

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

33. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5583/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2007-08:- “Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ml Overseas Limited (hereinafter referred to as „MIOL‟ or „the Appellant‟) respectfully craves leave to prefer an appeal against the order dated 30 July 2013 passed

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

33. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5583/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2007-08:- “Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ml Overseas Limited (hereinafter referred to as „MIOL‟ or „the Appellant‟) respectfully craves leave to prefer an appeal against the order dated 30 July 2013 passed

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I. OVERSEAS LTD., NOIDA

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

33. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5583/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2007-08:- “Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ml Overseas Limited (hereinafter referred to as „MIOL‟ or „the Appellant‟) respectfully craves leave to prefer an appeal against the order dated 30 July 2013 passed

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

33. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5583/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2007-08:- “Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ml Overseas Limited (hereinafter referred to as „MIOL‟ or „the Appellant‟) respectfully craves leave to prefer an appeal against the order dated 30 July 2013 passed

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

33. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5583/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2007-08:- “Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ml Overseas Limited (hereinafter referred to as „MIOL‟ or „the Appellant‟) respectfully craves leave to prefer an appeal against the order dated 30 July 2013 passed

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

33. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal in ITA No. 5583/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2007-08:- “Based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, Ml Overseas Limited (hereinafter referred to as „MIOL‟ or „the Appellant‟) respectfully craves leave to prefer an appeal against the order dated 30 July 2013 passed