BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “section 68”+ Section 154(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,457Mumbai1,161Karnataka508Bangalore397Cochin268Jaipur267Chennai232Kolkata218Indore206Ahmedabad188Hyderabad143Chandigarh131Pune128Agra72Surat71Raipur58Lucknow54Guwahati54Calcutta54Visakhapatnam47Telangana42Nagpur42Amritsar37Rajkot33Jodhpur28SC22Cuttack18Patna12Allahabad8Dehradun8Ranchi7Rajasthan5Panaji4Orissa3Kerala3Varanasi3Jabalpur2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1Andhra Pradesh1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 44B14Section 914Addition to Income8Section 2637Section 12A4Section 113

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 5584/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as "the Act") as well as the directions issued by Dispute Resolution panel(DRP) are contrary to facts and law and are therefore bad in law. The same deserve to be set aside and the income as returned by the Appellant deserves to be accepted. 2. The AO have

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 3072/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as "the Act") as well as the directions issued by Dispute Resolution panel(DRP) are contrary to facts and law and are therefore bad in law. The same deserve to be set aside and the income as returned by the Appellant deserves to be accepted. 2. The AO have

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I. OVERSEAS LTD., NOIDA

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 3045/DEL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as "the Act") as well as the directions issued by Dispute Resolution panel(DRP) are contrary to facts and law and are therefore bad in law. The same deserve to be set aside and the income as returned by the Appellant deserves to be accepted. 2. The AO have

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 2956/DEL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as "the Act") as well as the directions issued by Dispute Resolution panel(DRP) are contrary to facts and law and are therefore bad in law. The same deserve to be set aside and the income as returned by the Appellant deserves to be accepted. 2. The AO have

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 5565/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as "the Act") as well as the directions issued by Dispute Resolution panel(DRP) are contrary to facts and law and are therefore bad in law. The same deserve to be set aside and the income as returned by the Appellant deserves to be accepted. 2. The AO have

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 5583/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as "the Act") as well as the directions issued by Dispute Resolution panel(DRP) are contrary to facts and law and are therefore bad in law. The same deserve to be set aside and the income as returned by the Appellant deserves to be accepted. 2. The AO have

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 5564/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as "the Act") as well as the directions issued by Dispute Resolution panel(DRP) are contrary to facts and law and are therefore bad in law. The same deserve to be set aside and the income as returned by the Appellant deserves to be accepted. 2. The AO have

SOCIAL EDUCATIONAL AND WELFARE ASSOCIATION,HALDWANI vs. ITO, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 184/DDN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun21 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Sh. Taran Deep Singh, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 154Section 68

1) dated 22.05.2024, in proceedings u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). 2. Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have denied section 11 exemption to the assessee, in the course of assessment framed in it’s case