BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “section 68”+ Section 124clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi951Mumbai665Karnataka503Bangalore237Ahmedabad211Jaipur164Chennai154Kolkata131Hyderabad120Chandigarh95Pune83Cochin81Indore81Calcutta54Raipur54Jabalpur51Rajkot45Surat42Telangana42Visakhapatnam35Cuttack32Nagpur27Lucknow27Amritsar17Agra13Guwahati12SC12Allahabad10Varanasi8Ranchi7Jodhpur6Rajasthan5Orissa3Patna2Dehradun1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 144C6Section 143(3)2

DCIT, CIRCLE- I, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. EXPRESS DRILLING SYSTEMS LLC, DEHRADUN

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee is partly

ITA 6114/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6114/Del/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम Dcit, Express Drilling Circle-1, Vs. Systems Llc, International Taxation, C/O Nangia & Co., 1St Floor, Ida, 46, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. E.C. Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Pan No.Aabce6891R अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & Cross Objection No. 13/Del/2018 (In I.T.A No.6114/Del/2017) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम Express Drilling Systems Llc, Dcit, Vs. C/O Nangia & Co., Circle-1, 1St Floor, Ida, 46, International Taxation, E.C. Road, Dehradun, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand. Pan No. Aabce6891R अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 234BSection 40

124 Taxmann.com 262) (Del.) as the AO passed final assessment order incomplete contravention u/s 144C and without passing a draft assessment order and without giving the assessee an opportunity to raise objection before the DRP. 3.1 The Ld. Counsel further submits that the similar view has been taken by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Nokia