BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 282clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi257Mumbai214Jaipur76Bangalore72Amritsar61Chandigarh48Ahmedabad36Kolkata35Raipur29Chennai26Pune24Rajkot23Patna17Hyderabad15Jodhpur10Agra8Surat7Dehradun4Allahabad3Indore3Visakhapatnam2Cuttack1Nagpur1SC1Jabalpur1Telangana1Varanasi1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 12A6Section 1475Addition to Income4Section 271(1)(b)3Section 69A3Section 234A3Section 113Penalty

AKHILESH SINGHAL,RISHIKESH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RISHIKESH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 78/DDN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Oct 2025AY 2014-15
Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 271(1)(b)Section 69A

reassessment proceedings were void ab initio because the notice u/s 148 and subsequent notices were not served on the assessee at the correct address or email ID. Consequently, the penalty levied for non-compliance was deleted.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "271(1)(b)", "148", "147", "144", "144B", "69A", "250", "142(1)", "234A", "234B", "282

AKHILESH SINGHAL,RISHIKESH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RISHIKESH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

3
ITA 64/DDN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Oct 2025AY 2014-15
Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 271(1)(b)Section 69A

282 of the Act.\"\n17. In view of above facts and circumstances of the case and\nkeeping in mind that AO himself has stated the address at which\nthe notice u/s 148 was sent, which incidentally was the incorrect\naddress and e-mail ID, thus we hold that notice u/s 148 was not\nserved upon the assessee and therefore, consequent

M/S. JAYCEES PUBLIC SCHOOL,NEW DELHI vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), DEHRADUN

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 247/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar U.S.Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv and Sh. Shrey Jain AdvFor Respondent: Sh. N. C. Upadhyay, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 147Section 148

Section 147 to 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. That in any case and in any view of the matter, action of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the action of Ld. AO in framing the impugned reassessment order u/s 148/143(3), is bad in law and against the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. That having regard

AKHILESH SINGHAL,RISHIKESH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RISHIKESH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 79/DDN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode]

Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 69A

147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s 144B of the Act and the remaining two appeals in ITA Nos. 78 & 79/DDN/2024 are filed by the assessee against penalty order, both dated 07.09.2022 passed u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 respectively. ITA Nos.64, 78 & 79/DDN/2024 2. As these three appeals are having the issues which