BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai735Delhi723Ahmedabad279Jaipur232Kolkata130Hyderabad129Chennai106Indore102Surat100Pune99Rajkot80Bangalore60Chandigarh51Amritsar43Cochin39Calcutta36Nagpur33Raipur30Allahabad29Agra26Lucknow21Visakhapatnam19Jodhpur10Jabalpur10Guwahati8Patna8Dehradun5Cuttack4Varanasi4Panaji3Telangana2Ranchi1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 1446Section 69A6Section 271(1)(c)5Penalty5Addition to Income5Section 1484Section 1322Section 143(2)2Section 143(1)

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN vs. SWARNGANGA CONSTRUCTION P.LTD, BHILWARA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 186/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri V.P. Rao

For Appellant: Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, CIT/DRFor Respondent: Sh. Kapil Goel, Advocate
Section 144Section 153CSection 249(3)Section 250(4)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act respectively for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. In the quantum appeal, the assessee raised following grounds : “1. On facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in condoning the delay of more than 2 years merely on ground that the erstwhile directors

2
Unexplained Investment2
Reopening of Assessment2

MRS. NIDHI YADAV,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, RUDRAPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 117/DDN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No.115/Ddn/2024, A.Y. 2013-14 Ita No.117/Ddn/2024, A.Y. 2015-16 Nidhi Yadav, Vs. Income Tax Officer, B-801, Forest Residency, Ward 2(1)(4), Dehradun, Uttarakhand Income Tax Office, Pin Code: 248014 Rudrapur, Uttarakhand Pan: Acapy5157E (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Mohit Dev, Ca Respondent By Sh. Amarpal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06/05/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31/07/2025 Order Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

Section 143(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

credited extra in her bank account is taken as unexplained income and added u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the total income of the F.Y. under consideration and charged for tax u/s 115BBE of the Act. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the LT. Act, 1961 is initiated separately for concealment of particulars of income

SMT. NIDHI YADAV,DEHRADUN vs. ITO- W-2(1)(4),, RUDRAPUR

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/DDN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraita No.115/Ddn/2024, A.Y. 2013-14 Ita No.117/Ddn/2024, A.Y. 2015-16 Nidhi Yadav, Vs. Income Tax Officer, B-801, Forest Residency, Ward 2(1)(4), Dehradun, Uttarakhand Income Tax Office, Pin Code: 248014 Rudrapur, Uttarakhand Pan: Acapy5157E (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Mohit Dev, Ca Respondent By Sh. Amarpal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06/05/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31/07/2025 Order Per Avdhesh Kumar Mishra, Am Common Facts & Similar Grounds Arise In The Above Captioned Appeals Of The Assessee; Therefore, These Appeals Were Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Off By This Common Order.

Section 143(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

credited extra in her bank account is taken as unexplained income and added u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the total income of the F.Y. under consideration and charged for tax u/s 115BBE of the Act. Penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the LT. Act, 1961 is initiated separately for concealment of particulars of income

SH. KAMAL NARAYAN SHARMA,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, ITA No.6908/Del/2014 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes; ITA No

ITA 6908/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Oct 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Rajat Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Shri S.K. Chatterjee, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

penalty of Rs.29,25,144/- levied by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act relating to assessment year 2008-09. ITA No.512/Del/2014 filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 26.11.2013 of the CIT(A)-1, Dehradun, relating to assessment year 2004-05. The assessee has filed CO No.231/Del/2015 against the appeal of the Revenue

SHRI K.N. SHARMA,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, ITA No.6908/Del/2014 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes; ITA No

ITA 1687/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Oct 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Rajat Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Shri S.K. Chatterjee, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

penalty of Rs.29,25,144/- levied by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act relating to assessment year 2008-09. ITA No.512/Del/2014 filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 26.11.2013 of the CIT(A)-1, Dehradun, relating to assessment year 2004-05. The assessee has filed CO No.231/Del/2015 against the appeal of the Revenue