Search: penalty u/s 271 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi455 Mumbai365 Jaipur209 Indore117 Ahmedabad114 Hyderabad109 Kolkata101 Chennai98 Bangalore78 Pune74 Rajkot66 Surat57 Chandigarh53 Ranchi38 Amritsar31 Nagpur30 Guwahati29 Allahabad25 Patna25 Raipur19 Cuttack16 Lucknow12 Agra11 Cochin10 Jodhpur7 Dehradun6 Visakhapatnam5 Jabalpur5

Key Topics

Section 292C6 Section 143(3)6 Section 153C6 Addition to Income6 Section 250(6)4 Section 1324 Section 153A4 Section 143(2)4 Section 142(1)

SHRI CHHOTEY LAL VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 3396/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 250(6)Section 292C

undisclosed income of the assessee and penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T Act, is also initiated for furnishing

4

Undisclosed Income2

SHRI CHHOTEY LAL VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 3397/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Jan 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 250(6)Section 292C

undisclosed income of the assessee and penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T Act, is also initiated for furnishing

SH.PAWAN ANAND,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 33/DDN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishraिनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 बनाम Sh. Pawan Anand, Income Tax Officer, 43, Dhamawala Bazaar, Vs. Ward 1(1)(2), 13-A, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Subhash Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Pan No.Agqpa0214J अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

undisclosed income of the assessee by the Assessing Officer while completing the assessment. The Assessing Officer also initiated penalty proceedings for concealed particulars of income and levied penalty of Rs.2,93,083/-. On appeal the Ld. CIT(A) sustained the penalty. 3. In our considered view the difference between the stamp duty value and the actual sale consideration which

SHRI PURAN SINGH VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 3400/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 250(6)Section 292C

undisclosed income of the assessee . And since he had taken exemption u/s 54 with respect to the purchase of above land from Durga verma but sold the land before the completion of statutory time as given in the provisions of section 54, the entire amount of Rs.50 lakhs is liable for taxation. Penalty u/s 271

SHRI PURAN SINGH VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 3401/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Jan 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 250(6)Section 292C

undisclosed income of the assessee . And since he had taken exemption u/s 54 with respect to the purchase of above land from Durga verma but sold the land before the completion of statutory time as given in the provisions of section 54, the entire amount of Rs.50 lakhs is liable for taxation. Penalty u/s 271

ASSITANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DEHRADUN vs. POWER MACHINES, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal preferred by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 133/DDN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Ansaul Sachar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Mohan Lal Joshi, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

271(1)(c) of the Act. 7. The Ld. AO. has erred in acknowledging the fact that the appellant has neither concealed any income nor furnished inaccurate particulars of income in respect of the addition made to warrant levy of penalty." 4. Before the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee filed a detailed submission as under: “Ground