BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 56(2)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi523Mumbai387Karnataka120Jaipur119Bangalore97Ahmedabad92Indore48Chennai45Kolkata37Raipur37Calcutta34Hyderabad32Pune28Chandigarh26Lucknow25Agra16Nagpur15Rajkot15Surat8Dehradun8Patna6Varanasi6Guwahati5Ranchi4Allahabad4Cuttack3SC2Cochin2Telangana2Visakhapatnam1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 44B14Section 914Addition to Income8Section 2637Section 271(1)(c)6Section 50C4

SHRI PRITPAL SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 189/DDN/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Sh. C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing) Shri Pritpal Singh, Vs. Acit, 71, Guru Road, Circle-2, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Ahkps3632F Assessee By : Shri Savyasachi Kumar Sahai, Adv Revenue By: Shri Amar Singh Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 22/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 15/09/2023

For Appellant: Shri Savyasachi Kumar Sahai, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Amar Singh Rana, Sr. DR
Section 271(1)(c)Section 50CSection 56(2)(vii)

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act could be levied at an addition which has been made u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act on a deeming fiction. 3. We have heard the rival submission and perused the material available on record. The Assessee filed original return of income on 29.11.2014 for AY 2014-15 declaring total income

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 3072/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

vii) without appreciating that the said amount represented reimbursement of service tax which is not chargeable to tax. Lew of interest 9. The Ld AO has erred on facts and in law in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act disregarding the fact that Appellant is a non-resident assessee and its entire revenues/receipts are subject

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I. OVERSEAS LTD., NOIDA

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 3045/DEL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

vii) without appreciating that the said amount represented reimbursement of service tax which is not chargeable to tax. Lew of interest 9. The Ld AO has erred on facts and in law in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act disregarding the fact that Appellant is a non-resident assessee and its entire revenues/receipts are subject

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 2956/DEL/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

vii) without appreciating that the said amount represented reimbursement of service tax which is not chargeable to tax. Lew of interest 9. The Ld AO has erred on facts and in law in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act disregarding the fact that Appellant is a non-resident assessee and its entire revenues/receipts are subject

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 5565/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

vii) without appreciating that the said amount represented reimbursement of service tax which is not chargeable to tax. Lew of interest 9. The Ld AO has erred on facts and in law in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act disregarding the fact that Appellant is a non-resident assessee and its entire revenues/receipts are subject

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 5583/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

vii) without appreciating that the said amount represented reimbursement of service tax which is not chargeable to tax. Lew of interest 9. The Ld AO has erred on facts and in law in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act disregarding the fact that Appellant is a non-resident assessee and its entire revenues/receipts are subject

ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. M.I, OVERSEAS LTD., MUMBAI

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 5564/DEL/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

vii) without appreciating that the said amount represented reimbursement of service tax which is not chargeable to tax. Lew of interest 9. The Ld AO has erred on facts and in law in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act disregarding the fact that Appellant is a non-resident assessee and its entire revenues/receipts are subject

MI OVERSEAS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADIT, DEHRADUN

In the result ITA number 5584/Del/2013 filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 5584/DEL/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Jun 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Thakur Singh Mapwal, JCIT DR
Section 263Section 44BSection 9

vii) without appreciating that the said amount represented reimbursement of service tax which is not chargeable to tax. Lew of interest 9. The Ld AO has erred on facts and in law in levying interest under section 234B and section 234C of the Act disregarding the fact that Appellant is a non-resident assessee and its entire revenues/receipts are subject