Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271C13 Section 194A8 Section 2017 Section 2713 Penalty3 TDS3 Section 201(1)2 Section 2742 Section 42 Section 194A(3)(iii)

THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), DEHRADUN vs. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, NANITAL

In the result, all the Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 18/DDN/2020[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Jul 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: The Hon'Ble Itat. 3. That The Ld. Cit(Appeals), Haldwani Be Set Aside That Of The Ao Be Restored.”

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT DR

Section 201Section 271Section 271C

u/s 271C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'). However, this plea of the assessee was out-rightly rejected by the assessing officer on the premise that ignorance of law is not an excuse. Accordingly, penalty was imposed as under :- AY 2014-15 AY 2015-16 AY 2016-17 AY 2017-18 Amount of Rs.1

THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), DEHRADUN vs. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, NANITAL

YES BANK LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), DEHRADUN

THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), DEHRADUN vs. THE DIRECTOR, HIGHER EDUCATION, NANITAL

YES BANK LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), DEHRADUN

YES BANK LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. CIT (TDS), DEHRADUN