BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai123Delhi85Ahmedabad43Hyderabad26Raipur19Surat10Bangalore10Jaipur8Rajkot8Kolkata4Indore4Dehradun3Chandigarh2Nagpur2Jodhpur2Jabalpur1Patna1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 1013Section 143(3)6Section 143(2)6Section 1485Section 1474Section 234A3Penalty3Section 10(2688)2Section 271(1)(c)

M/S. UTTARAKHAND PURV SAINIK KALYAN NIGAM LTD.,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 725/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun19 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2013-14] M/S Uttrakhand Purv Ito,Ward-2(5), Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. Aayakar Bhawan,13-A, Subhash (Upnl) Vs Road, Dehradun Uttrakhand- Station Sub Area, Garhi 248003 Cantt, Dehradun-248003 Pan-Aaacu7129D Assessee Revenue Assessee By Shri Tarandeep Singh, Adv. Revenue By Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 31.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 19.03.2025

Section 10Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 234A

u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was wholly unreasonable, uncalled for and bad in law. 5. That the levy of interest under section 234A/B/C and 234D is erroneous and deserves to be deleted. 6. That the intention of penalty proceedings us 271

2
Reassessment2
Addition to Income2

M/S. UTTARAKHAND PURV SAINIK KALYAN NIGAM LTD.,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3071/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Nov 2023AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Malik, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT
Section 10Section 10(2688)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 271(1)(c)

section 234A/B/C and 234D is erroneous and deserves to be deleted. 6. That the intention of penalty proceedings u/s 271

M/S. UTTARAKHAND PURV SAINIK KALYAN NIGAM LTD.,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3072/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Nov 2023AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Malik, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Poonam Sharma, Addl. CIT
Section 10Section 10(2688)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 271(1)(c)

section 234A/B/C and 234D is erroneous and deserves to be deleted. 6. That the intention of penalty proceedings u/s 271