BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,211Delhi649Ahmedabad316Jaipur167Kolkata161Pune146Bangalore117Chandigarh101Hyderabad94Chennai92Raipur77Rajkot55Amritsar52Nagpur51Surat46Visakhapatnam39Indore34Calcutta34Cuttack27Guwahati25Lucknow18Cochin14Panaji9Jabalpur9Karnataka6Agra5Ranchi5Jodhpur4SC4Telangana3Allahabad3Patna2Dehradun2Varanasi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)2Section 1442Penalty2Addition to Income2

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN vs. SWARNGANGA CONSTRUCTION P.LTD, BHILWARA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 186/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri V.P. Rao

For Appellant: Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, CIT/DRFor Respondent: Sh. Kapil Goel, Advocate
Section 144Section 153CSection 249(3)Section 250(4)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act 1961.” 8. The Assessing Officer has computed the total income of the assessee at Rs.3,38,95,000/- which was challenged by the assessee before the CIT(A) by filing a belated appeal. Before the CIT(A), assessee has also filed additional evidence to explain the source of various transaction of investment/purchase

M/S THDC INDIA LIMITED, RISHIKESH,RISHIKESH vs. PCIT, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 69/DDN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun24 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 270ASection 80

carried forward from earlier years are outstanding for\n12 months and the same was required to be adopted for the purpose of\ncalculation of LPSC.\n3.8. The Appellant submits that the mercantile system of accounting does not\nwarrant taxation of hypothetical income and therefore revenue recognition must\nbe postponed when there is uncertainty of realization. As per the provisions