BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “house property”+ Section 72clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,482Mumbai1,333Bangalore582Karnataka567Chennai353Jaipur317Ahmedabad270Hyderabad195Kolkata192Surat167Chandigarh164Cochin128Pune102Indore93Telangana71Rajkot58Raipur58Visakhapatnam57Nagpur55Calcutta53Cuttack33Amritsar31Lucknow30Guwahati28SC25Jodhpur12Dehradun12Agra8Rajasthan7Varanasi7Patna3Orissa3Allahabad2Ranchi1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Andhra Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 153A36Section 40A(3)18Addition to Income12Section 13210Search & Seizure10Section 132(4)8House Property8Section 143(1)6Section 40A

MANAV JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

ITA 7092/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Nov 2020AY 2010-11
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 40ASection 40A(3)

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

MANAV JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

ITA 7093/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Nov 2020AY 2012-13
6
Disallowance6
Section 143(3)4
Section 133(6)4
Section 132
Section 143(1)
Section 153A
Section 40A
Section 40A(3)

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

MEENA JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

ITA 7097/DEL/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Nov 2020AY 2015-16
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 40ASection 40A(3)

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

MANSI JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

ITA 7099/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Nov 2020AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 40ASection 40A(3)

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

MEENA JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

ITA 7095/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Nov 2020AY 2010-11
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 40ASection 40A(3)

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

MANSI JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

ITA 7098/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Nov 2020AY 2010-11
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 40ASection 40A(3)

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

RISHI BANSAL,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4845/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 4845/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 4846/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Rishi Bansal, Vs Dcit, 132, Doon Palm City, Central Circle, Pathri Bagh, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Akvpb7754R Assessee By : Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.04.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.04.2022 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Dehradun Dated 31.03.2016. 2. In Ita No. 4845/Del/2016, Following Grounds Have Been Raised By The Assessee: “1. That The Impugned Proceeding Initiated U/S 153A & Passing The Impugned Order Under That Section Is Bad In Law & Without Jurisdiction & Addition Are Also Made Without Any Incriminating Material Found During The Course Of Search. 2. That Having Regard To The Fact & Circumstances Of The Case, Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Action Of Ao In Making Addition Of Rs.50 Lacs Which Was Made By The Ao Only On The Basis Of Alleged Statement Which Has Even Being Retracted On 09.07.2012 By The Assessee. Thus The Addition Is Not Sustainable. 3. That In Any Case & In Any View Of The Matter Action Of Ld. Cit(A) In Making Addition Of Rs.50 Lacs Is Bad In Law & Against The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.“

For Appellant: Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, CIT DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153A

house property and other sources. A search u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 took place in the business and residential premises of the assessee on 26.04.2012 in M/s Ganga Realtors Group of cases. The assessee filed return of income on 10.07.2014 declaring income of Rs.4,72,526/-and the assessment u/s 153A was completed on 01.09.2014. Surrendered amount

RISHI BANSAL,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4846/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 4845/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 4846/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Rishi Bansal, Vs Dcit, 132, Doon Palm City, Central Circle, Pathri Bagh, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Akvpb7754R Assessee By : Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.04.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.04.2022 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Dehradun Dated 31.03.2016. 2. In Ita No. 4845/Del/2016, Following Grounds Have Been Raised By The Assessee: “1. That The Impugned Proceeding Initiated U/S 153A & Passing The Impugned Order Under That Section Is Bad In Law & Without Jurisdiction & Addition Are Also Made Without Any Incriminating Material Found During The Course Of Search. 2. That Having Regard To The Fact & Circumstances Of The Case, Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Action Of Ao In Making Addition Of Rs.50 Lacs Which Was Made By The Ao Only On The Basis Of Alleged Statement Which Has Even Being Retracted On 09.07.2012 By The Assessee. Thus The Addition Is Not Sustainable. 3. That In Any Case & In Any View Of The Matter Action Of Ld. Cit(A) In Making Addition Of Rs.50 Lacs Is Bad In Law & Against The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.“

For Appellant: Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, CIT DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153A

house property and other sources. A search u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 took place in the business and residential premises of the assessee on 26.04.2012 in M/s Ganga Realtors Group of cases. The assessee filed return of income on 10.07.2014 declaring income of Rs.4,72,526/-and the assessment u/s 153A was completed on 01.09.2014. Surrendered amount

SHIV KUMAR AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 27/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

72,00,000/- 11312020259/Siddheshawri Vypaar 11/11/201t RTGS -ORBCH 1131 Rs. 33,00,000/- 5047108/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt.. Abhishek Agarwal Date Cheque Particulars Credit No. 15.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11288046229 55,00,000/- Siddheshwari Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 15.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11288050575 16,00,000/- Siddheshwar Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 17.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11290052503 50,00,000/- Siddheshwari Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 17. 10.2011 RTGS

ABHISHEK AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 29/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

72,00,000/- 11312020259/Siddheshawri Vypaar 11/11/201t RTGS -ORBCH 1131 Rs. 33,00,000/- 5047108/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt.. Abhishek Agarwal Date Cheque Particulars Credit No. 15.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11288046229 55,00,000/- Siddheshwari Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 15.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11288050575 16,00,000/- Siddheshwar Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 17.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11290052503 50,00,000/- Siddheshwari Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 17. 10.2011 RTGS

SAURABH AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 28/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

72,00,000/- 11312020259/Siddheshawri Vypaar 11/11/201t RTGS -ORBCH 1131 Rs. 33,00,000/- 5047108/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt.. Abhishek Agarwal Date Cheque Particulars Credit No. 15.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11288046229 55,00,000/- Siddheshwari Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 15.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11288050575 16,00,000/- Siddheshwar Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 17.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11290052503 50,00,000/- Siddheshwari Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 17. 10.2011 RTGS

RUKMAN AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 26/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

72,00,000/- 11312020259/Siddheshawri Vypaar 11/11/201t RTGS -ORBCH 1131 Rs. 33,00,000/- 5047108/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt.. Abhishek Agarwal Date Cheque Particulars Credit No. 15.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11288046229 55,00,000/- Siddheshwari Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 15.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11288050575 16,00,000/- Siddheshwar Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 17.10.2011 RTGS-ORBCH 11290052503 50,00,000/- Siddheshwari Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. 17. 10.2011 RTGS