BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 69clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,618Mumbai1,451Bangalore613Karnataka555Jaipur340Chennai310Hyderabad253Kolkata219Ahmedabad201Surat185Chandigarh162Pune101Indore101Cochin100Telangana82Amritsar81Raipur66Visakhapatnam60Calcutta54Nagpur47Lucknow47Cuttack44Rajkot41Guwahati26Agra22SC21Allahabad12Patna11Jodhpur11Varanasi8Rajasthan7Dehradun4Orissa3Jabalpur2Ranchi1Gauhati1Kerala1Panaji1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 153A8Section 143(3)4Section 133(6)4Reassessment4Addition to Income4Search & Seizure4Natural Justice4

SAURABH AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 28/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

69. 4. Before the Ld. CIT (A), the assessee had taken a legal ground that no incriminating document was found during the course of search and, therefore, the addition made by the AO is beyond the scope of assessment under section 153A. However, the Ld. CIT (A) rejected the assessee’s contention holding that Hon’ble Allahabad High Court

RUKMAN AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 26/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

69. 4. Before the Ld. CIT (A), the assessee had taken a legal ground that no incriminating document was found during the course of search and, therefore, the addition made by the AO is beyond the scope of assessment under section 153A. However, the Ld. CIT (A) rejected the assessee’s contention holding that Hon’ble Allahabad High Court

SHIV KUMAR AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 27/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

69. 4. Before the Ld. CIT (A), the assessee had taken a legal ground that no incriminating document was found during the course of search and, therefore, the addition made by the AO is beyond the scope of assessment under section 153A. However, the Ld. CIT (A) rejected the assessee’s contention holding that Hon’ble Allahabad High Court

ABHISHEK AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 29/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

69. 4. Before the Ld. CIT (A), the assessee had taken a legal ground that no incriminating document was found during the course of search and, therefore, the addition made by the AO is beyond the scope of assessment under section 153A. However, the Ld. CIT (A) rejected the assessee’s contention holding that Hon’ble Allahabad High Court