BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “house property”+ Section 25clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,916Delhi2,890Bangalore1,014Karnataka678Chennai633Jaipur603Ahmedabad507Hyderabad499Kolkata403Pune320Chandigarh291Indore237Surat228Visakhapatnam182Cochin176Telangana165Amritsar132Rajkot105Raipur96Lucknow86Nagpur73SC65Calcutta62Cuttack60Agra45Patna38Jodhpur37Guwahati26Rajasthan21Allahabad15Dehradun13Varanasi13Kerala8Orissa7Ranchi6Jabalpur4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Panaji3Andhra Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Gauhati1Punjab & Haryana1Himachal Pradesh1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 153A13Section 54B11Section 143(3)10Addition to Income9Section 2638Section 132(4)8Section 1477Natural Justice6Section 245

SANJEEV JAIN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 86/DDN/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun13 May 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishi

Section 132Section 139Section 143Section 153ASection 24

25 June 2019 wherein the addition of Rs 2 lakhs being the disallowance of interest amount paid on housing loan and 1 claimed as a deduction under section 24 (b) of The Income Tax Act 1961 made by the learned Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, Dehradun made by order under section 153A (1) (b) read with section

OMWATI,DEHRADUN vs. PR.CIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Section 1325
Search & Seizure5
Reassessment5
ITA 6853/DEL/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshsmt. Omwati Pr. Cit W/O Sh. Dariyav Singh Dehradun 171/1, Vasant Vihar, Vs. Dehradun Pan-Aanpw 6438K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263Section 54B

house by an order of a competent court, which they could not have violated. 25. In view of the aforestated peculiar facts of the case and looking at the definition of the term 'transfer" as defined under Section 2(47) of the Act, we are of the view that the appellants were entitled to relief under Section

MUSSORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,DEHRADUN vs. DY.CIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as above

ITA 55/DDN/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun19 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: the date of agreement. In his reply AR of the assessee submitted that only Rs.14,00,415/- was received during the year and the assessee has inadvertently forgot to include this amount in its income. So, this may be considered as income from transfer of the above property. He furnished receipt of the above amount which is place on record. MDDA

Section 4Section 43C

property. He furnished receipt of the above amount which is place on record. Page 2 MDDA Sub-section 4 of section 43CA clearly states that the provisions of sub-section (3) shall apply only in a case where the amount of consideration or a part thereof has been received by any mode other than cash on or before the date

RISHI BANSAL,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4846/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 4845/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 4846/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Rishi Bansal, Vs Dcit, 132, Doon Palm City, Central Circle, Pathri Bagh, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Akvpb7754R Assessee By : Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.04.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.04.2022 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Dehradun Dated 31.03.2016. 2. In Ita No. 4845/Del/2016, Following Grounds Have Been Raised By The Assessee: “1. That The Impugned Proceeding Initiated U/S 153A & Passing The Impugned Order Under That Section Is Bad In Law & Without Jurisdiction & Addition Are Also Made Without Any Incriminating Material Found During The Course Of Search. 2. That Having Regard To The Fact & Circumstances Of The Case, Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Action Of Ao In Making Addition Of Rs.50 Lacs Which Was Made By The Ao Only On The Basis Of Alleged Statement Which Has Even Being Retracted On 09.07.2012 By The Assessee. Thus The Addition Is Not Sustainable. 3. That In Any Case & In Any View Of The Matter Action Of Ld. Cit(A) In Making Addition Of Rs.50 Lacs Is Bad In Law & Against The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.“

For Appellant: Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, CIT DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153A

house property and other sources. A search u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 took place in the business and residential premises of the assessee on 26.04.2012 in M/s Ganga Realtors Group of cases. The assessee filed return of income on 10.07.2014 declaring income of Rs.4,72,526/-and the assessment u/s 153A was completed on 01.09.2014. Surrendered amount

RISHI BANSAL,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 4845/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 4845/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2012-13 Ita No. 4846/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year: 2013-14 Rishi Bansal, Vs Dcit, 132, Doon Palm City, Central Circle, Pathri Bagh, Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Akvpb7754R Assessee By : Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.04.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.04.2022 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Dehradun Dated 31.03.2016. 2. In Ita No. 4845/Del/2016, Following Grounds Have Been Raised By The Assessee: “1. That The Impugned Proceeding Initiated U/S 153A & Passing The Impugned Order Under That Section Is Bad In Law & Without Jurisdiction & Addition Are Also Made Without Any Incriminating Material Found During The Course Of Search. 2. That Having Regard To The Fact & Circumstances Of The Case, Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law & On Facts In Confirming The Action Of Ao In Making Addition Of Rs.50 Lacs Which Was Made By The Ao Only On The Basis Of Alleged Statement Which Has Even Being Retracted On 09.07.2012 By The Assessee. Thus The Addition Is Not Sustainable. 3. That In Any Case & In Any View Of The Matter Action Of Ld. Cit(A) In Making Addition Of Rs.50 Lacs Is Bad In Law & Against The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.“

For Appellant: Sh. Vivek Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, CIT DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153A

house property and other sources. A search u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 took place in the business and residential premises of the assessee on 26.04.2012 in M/s Ganga Realtors Group of cases. The assessee filed return of income on 10.07.2014 declaring income of Rs.4,72,526/-and the assessment u/s 153A was completed on 01.09.2014. Surrendered amount

SHRI GANGA RAM ADWANI,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, RISHIKESH

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1511/DEL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun11 Nov 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaasstt. Year 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Chatterjee, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234C

25,000/- over and above the registered amount as undisclosed investment of the assessee which was out of his undisclosed income” is factually incorrect and hence not tenable. 2 Ganga Ram Adwani vs DCIT 2.3 That further the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has also failed to appreciate that, “the onus to explain a document found during search

RUKMAN AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 26/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

25,00,000/- ORBCH1129107G389/Siddheshawri 20/10/2011 RTGS Rs.30,00,000/- ORBCH11293089764/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt., Ltd. 01/11/2011 RTGS Rs. 10,00,000/- ORBCH 11305064096/ Siddheshawri 01/11/2011 RTGS -ORBCH Rs. 20,00,000/- 11305069164/Siddheshawri Vypaar 01/11/2011 RTGS –ORBCH1 Rs. 10,00,000/- 1305070069/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt. 08/11/2011 RTGS -ORBCH Rs. 72,00,000/- 11312020259/Siddheshawri Vypaar 11/11/201t RTGS -ORBCH 1131 Rs. 33,00,000/- 5047108/Siddheshawri Vypaar

SAURABH AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 28/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

25,00,000/- ORBCH1129107G389/Siddheshawri 20/10/2011 RTGS Rs.30,00,000/- ORBCH11293089764/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt., Ltd. 01/11/2011 RTGS Rs. 10,00,000/- ORBCH 11305064096/ Siddheshawri 01/11/2011 RTGS -ORBCH Rs. 20,00,000/- 11305069164/Siddheshawri Vypaar 01/11/2011 RTGS –ORBCH1 Rs. 10,00,000/- 1305070069/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt. 08/11/2011 RTGS -ORBCH Rs. 72,00,000/- 11312020259/Siddheshawri Vypaar 11/11/201t RTGS -ORBCH 1131 Rs. 33,00,000/- 5047108/Siddheshawri Vypaar

SHIV KUMAR AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 27/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

25,00,000/- ORBCH1129107G389/Siddheshawri 20/10/2011 RTGS Rs.30,00,000/- ORBCH11293089764/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt., Ltd. 01/11/2011 RTGS Rs. 10,00,000/- ORBCH 11305064096/ Siddheshawri 01/11/2011 RTGS -ORBCH Rs. 20,00,000/- 11305069164/Siddheshawri Vypaar 01/11/2011 RTGS –ORBCH1 Rs. 10,00,000/- 1305070069/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt. 08/11/2011 RTGS -ORBCH Rs. 72,00,000/- 11312020259/Siddheshawri Vypaar 11/11/201t RTGS -ORBCH 1131 Rs. 33,00,000/- 5047108/Siddheshawri Vypaar

ABHISHEK AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 29/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 153A

25,00,000/- ORBCH1129107G389/Siddheshawri 20/10/2011 RTGS Rs.30,00,000/- ORBCH11293089764/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt., Ltd. 01/11/2011 RTGS Rs. 10,00,000/- ORBCH 11305064096/ Siddheshawri 01/11/2011 RTGS -ORBCH Rs. 20,00,000/- 11305069164/Siddheshawri Vypaar 01/11/2011 RTGS –ORBCH1 Rs. 10,00,000/- 1305070069/Siddheshawri Vypaar Pvt. 08/11/2011 RTGS -ORBCH Rs. 72,00,000/- 11312020259/Siddheshawri Vypaar 11/11/201t RTGS -ORBCH 1131 Rs. 33,00,000/- 5047108/Siddheshawri Vypaar

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MDDA, TRANSPORT NAGAR DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as above

ITA 95/DDN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun21 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 43B

housing scheme, constructing roads, drains, beautification, etc., filed its Income Tax Returns (hereinafter, the ‘ITR’) of AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 on 31.10.2017 and 30.10.2018 declaring income of Rs.97,26,470/- and NIL respectively. These cases were picked up for scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing officer (hereinafter, the ‘AO’) noticed that the assessee was authorized

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MDDA, TRANSPORT NAGAR DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as above

ITA 96/DDN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun21 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 43B

housing scheme, constructing roads, drains, beautification, etc., filed its Income Tax Returns (hereinafter, the ‘ITR’) of AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 on 31.10.2017 and 30.10.2018 declaring income of Rs.97,26,470/- and NIL respectively. These cases were picked up for scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing officer (hereinafter, the ‘AO’) noticed that the assessee was authorized

SH. DEVENDRA DUTT PANT,HARIDWAR vs. DCIT , UTTARKAHAND

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 149/DDN/2025[2106-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2106-2017

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 54BSection 54E

property yielding agricultural produce on the basis of its yield? At the risk of repetition, we may mention that not all of these factors would be present or absent in any case and that in each case one or more of those factors may make appearance and that the ultimate decision will have to be reached on a balanced consideration