MANAV JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

MEENA JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

MANSI JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

MANSI JOHAR,RISHIKESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

house property, capital gain and other sources. The assessee had filed the return of income declaring total income at Rs. 22,13,440/- and agricultural income of Rs. 46,92,034/-. The return was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). A search and seizure operation was conducted

SHIV KUMAR AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

153 PAN ABXPA3880C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CA Department by : Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 29/01/2021 Date of 18/03/2021 pronouncement O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the above mentioned assessees against separate impugned orders dated, 20.3.2019 in the case of Ms. Rukman Aggarwal, Shri

SAURABH AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

153 PAN ABXPA3880C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CA Department by : Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 29/01/2021 Date of 18/03/2021 pronouncement O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the above mentioned assessees against separate impugned orders dated, 20.3.2019 in the case of Ms. Rukman Aggarwal, Shri

RUKMAN AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

153 PAN ABXPA3880C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CA Department by : Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 29/01/2021 Date of 18/03/2021 pronouncement O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the above mentioned assessees against separate impugned orders dated, 20.3.2019 in the case of Ms. Rukman Aggarwal, Shri

ABHISHEK AGARWAL,U S NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI

In the result the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri B.R.R. Kumarassessment Year: 2010-11

153 PAN ABXPA3880C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Rakesh Sehgal, CA Department by : Shri Naveen Chand Upadhyay, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 29/01/2021 Date of 18/03/2021 pronouncement O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M.: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the above mentioned assessees against separate impugned orders dated, 20.3.2019 in the case of Ms. Rukman Aggarwal, Shri

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MDDA, TRANSPORT NAGAR DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as above

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

housing scheme, constructing roads, drains, beautification, etc., filed its Income Tax Returns (hereinafter, the ‘ITR’) of AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 on 31.10.2017 and 30.10.2018 declaring income of Rs.97,26,470/- and NIL respectively. These cases were picked up for scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing officer (hereinafter, the ‘AO’) noticed that the assessee was authorized

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MDDA, TRANSPORT NAGAR DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as above

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

housing scheme, constructing roads, drains, beautification, etc., filed its Income Tax Returns (hereinafter, the ‘ITR’) of AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 on 31.10.2017 and 30.10.2018 declaring income of Rs.97,26,470/- and NIL respectively. These cases were picked up for scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing officer (hereinafter, the ‘AO’) noticed that the assessee was authorized