BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi567Mumbai463Karnataka424Bangalore129Ahmedabad86Chennai84Kolkata77Jaipur65Telangana61Indore37Raipur32Pune29Cuttack27Chandigarh25Calcutta16SC16Lucknow15Cochin10Varanasi7Rajasthan6Visakhapatnam6Surat5Guwahati5Orissa5Amritsar5Hyderabad3Agra2Dehradun2Kerala2Nagpur2Rajkot2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jodhpur1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 54B7Section 543Section 1483Section 692

PRAKASHI UNIYAL,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, KOTDWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 7145/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun13 May 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishia Y 2009-10 Appellant Respondent Ms Praksahi Uniyal The Income Tax Officer F-27 Thdc Colony Vs. Kotdwar Ajabpur Dehradun Pan : Ccxpp8494E ( Appellant ) ( Respondent )

Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 54Section 69

permanent account number. Such notices were issued on 5/11/2012. At all the stages assessee was represented, therefore it cannot be said that no proper opportunity of hearing was granted to the assessee. It was also not shown before us that what prevented assessee to submit before lower authorities. Even before us, no new submissions are made. Therefore

SH. DEVENDRA DUTT PANT,HARIDWAR vs. DCIT , UTTARKAHAND

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 149/DDN/2025[2106-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2106-2017

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 54BSection 54E

permanent or temporary nature? 7) Whether the land, though entered in revenue records, had never been actually used for 8 Devendra Dutt Pant agriculture, that is, it had never been ploughed or tilled? Whether the owner meant or intended to use it for agricultural purposes? 8) Whether the land was situate in a developed area? Whether its physical characteristics, surrounding