LAT SMT. SAROJ BANSAL,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

properties would only be income from business and not income from capital gains. Consequently, learned Assessing Officer had also denied the claim of deduction under section 54F of the Act in respect of reinvestment made in new house

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), DEHRADUN, SUBHASH ROAD, DEHRADUN vs. AMBEY ASSOCIATES, RAJPUR ROAD, DEHRADUN

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed being devoid of any merit

Bench: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY (Judicial Member), SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA (Accountant Member)

Income from House Property by the assessee. The ld. AR contended that the assessee is not engaged in the business

OMWATI,DEHRADUN vs. PR.CIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshsmt. Omwati Pr. Cit W/O Sh. Dariyav Singh Dehradun 171/1, Vasant Vihar, Vs. Dehradun Pan-Aanpw 6438K (Appellant) (Respondent)

house property and income from business. The return of income for A.Y.2010-11 was filed on 30/09/2010 declaring total income of Rs.20

OM PRAKASH GUPTA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Om Prakash Gupta Vs Deputy/Assistant C/O. Matta Garg & Co. Commissioner Of Income Tax, 15, Astley Hall, Dehraudn, Income Tax Office, Uttarakhand Investigation Wing, 13 A, Pan: Abipg9323M Subhash Road, Central Circle, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. S. K. Matta, Ca Revenue By Sh. S. K. Chatterjee, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing 12/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 09/01/2026

income from house property, business and income from other sources. A search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income

INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH INDIA SOCIETY,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Institute Of Clinical Research Vs. Commissioner Of Income India Society, Tax (Appeals), 1St Floor, Building No.1, Dehradun Treenetra Vihar, Near Kargt Chowk, Dehradun Pan :Aabai3710P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr

Income from house property iii. Profits and gains from business or profession iv. Capital gains v. Income from other sources

DARIYAV SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. PR. CIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshsh. Sanjay Kumar Pr. Cit 170, Vasant Vihar-1 Dehradun Dehradun Vs. Pan-Akkpk 1007F (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Dariyav Singh Pr. Cit 28-Chakrata Road, Dehradun Dehradun Vs. Pan-Awkps 6026L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Dr. Rakesh Gupta & Mr. Sherey Jain, Advocates Respondent By Mr. N.S.Jangpangi, Cit-Dr

income from salary, business and house property. The return of income for A.Y.2010-11 was filed on 30/09/2010 declaring total income

SANJAY KUMAR,DEHRADUN vs. PRCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshsh. Sanjay Kumar Pr. Cit 170, Vasant Vihar-1 Dehradun Dehradun Vs. Pan-Akkpk 1007F (Appellant) (Respondent) Sh. Dariyav Singh Pr. Cit 28-Chakrata Road, Dehradun Dehradun Vs. Pan-Awkps 6026L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Dr. Rakesh Gupta & Mr. Sherey Jain, Advocates Respondent By Mr. N.S.Jangpangi, Cit-Dr

income from salary, business and house property. The return of income for A.Y.2010-11 was filed on 30/09/2010 declaring total income

SHALINI SRIVASTAVA,HALDWANI vs. WARD 2(1)(1) HALDWANI/, HALDWANI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year :2019-20] Shalini Srivastava Vs Ward-2(1)(1) Sheeshmahal, Opp. Haldwani Filter House, Uttarakhand Kathgodam, Haldwani, Uttarakhand-263139 Pan-Apyps8567D Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Prashant Kackar, Ca Revenue By Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 09.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 24.12.2025 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 08.07.2025 By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“Nfac”), Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Nfac/2018-19/10096852 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising Out Of The Assessment Order Dated 28.09.2021 Passed U/S 144 R.W.S. 144B Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Filed Her Return Of Income, Declaring Income From House Property Of Inr 51,754/- & Income Under The Head “Other Sources” Of Inr 17,56,736/-. The Total Income Of Inr 18,08,490/- Was Claimed As Set Off Against The Current Year Losses From Business & Profession Of Inr 31,04,998/- & Thus Total Income At Inr Nil Was Declared After Claiming Of Deduction Under Chapter Via Of Inr 1,56,918/-. The Return Of Income Was Selected For Complete Scrutiny. Notices U/S 143(2) Followed By Notices U/S 142(1) Were Issued From Time To Time Which Were Not Complied With. In Absence Of Any Reply By The Assessee, Order Was Passed U/S 144 As Per Information Available & Total Income Of The Assessee Was Assessed At Inr 13,32,38,065/- By Making Various Addition.

house property of INR 51,754/- and income under the head “other sources” of INR 17,56,736/-. The total income of INR 18,08,490/- was claimed as set off against the current year losses from business

AMAR NATH AHUJA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

Accordingly not sustainable. The ground no. 1 as raised stand allowed

Bench: Sh. Shamim Yahya & Sh. Anubhav Sharmaita No. 8349/Del/2018, A.Y. 2016-17 Amar Nath Ahuja Vs. Dcit C/O. Matta Garg & Co., Central Circle, 15-Astley Hall, Dehradun Dehradun Uttarakhand, Pan : Acdpa9783D (Appellant) (Respondent)

income from house property, business and profession, capital gains and other sources. A search and seizure operation was conducted in the case

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MDDA, TRANSPORT NAGAR DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as above

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

business of promoting and securing the development of Mussoorie and Dehradun Urban Area by developing for housing scheme, constructing roads, drains, beautification, etc., filed its Income Tax Returns (hereinafter, the ‘ITR’) of AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 on 31.10.2017 and 30.10.2018 declaring income of Rs.97,26,470/- and NIL respectively. These cases were picked up for scrutiny. During

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MDDA, TRANSPORT NAGAR DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as above

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

business of promoting and securing the development of Mussoorie and Dehradun Urban Area by developing for housing scheme, constructing roads, drains, beautification, etc., filed its Income Tax Returns (hereinafter, the ‘ITR’) of AY 2017-18 and 2018-19 on 31.10.2017 and 30.10.2018 declaring income of Rs.97,26,470/- and NIL respectively. These cases were picked up for scrutiny. During

MRS. DHOOMI DEVI,CHAMOLI vs. ITO, W-1(4)4, SRINAGAR, CHAMOLI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2022-23] Mrs. Dhoomi Devi Vs Ito C/O-Hotel Udai Palace Near . Ward-1(4)4 Narsingh Temple Srignagar, Chamoli Joshimath Chamoli, Uttarakhand-246174 Uttarakhand-246443 Pan-Adkpd6984B Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Tarandeep Singh, Adv. Revenue By Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 13.02.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 08.08.2024 By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“Nfac”), Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Nfac/2021-22/10329482 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising From The Assessment Order Dated 05.03.2024 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144B Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2022-23. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Is An Individual & The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass For Reason I.E. “Large Investment In Immovable Property As Compared To The Total Income”. The Ao Than Passed The Assessment Order U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144B On 05.03.2024 At A Total Income Of Inr 2,70,31,224/- As Against The Total Income Declared At Inr 29,45,000/- In The Return Of Income Filed By The Assessee.

income received is duly declared by the assessee. The assessee had sold one property jointly owned by her son for a total sum of INR 6.00 crores out of which assessee’s share was of INR 3.00 crores. Out of the long terms capital gains from the sale of said property, assessee claimed deduction u/s 54EC for investment in NHAI

MUSSORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,DEHRADUN vs. DY.CIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as above

Bench: the date of agreement. In his reply AR of the assessee submitted that only Rs.14,00,415/- was received during the year and the assessee has inadvertently forgot to include this amount in its income. So, this may be considered as income from transfer of the above property. He furnished receipt of the above amount which is place on record. MDDA

business of promoting and securing the development of Mussoorie and Dehradun Urban Area by developing for housing scheme, constructing roads, drains, beautification, etc., filed its Income Tax Return (hereinafter, the ‘ITR’) on 30.09.2014 declaring income of Rs.7,63,21,400/-. The case was picked up for limited scrutiny. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing officer (hereinafter

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN vs. OM PRAKASH GUPTA, DEHRADUN

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwalita No. 160/Ddn/2025 : Asstt. Year: 2023-24 Dcit, Vs Om Prakash Gupta, Central Circle, 19/A, Raj Vihar, Dehradun-2488001 Dehradun-248001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Abipg9323M Assessee By : Sh. S. K. Matta, Ca Revenue By : Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.01.2026 Order Per Satbeer Singh Godara: This Revenue’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2023-24, Arises Against The Cit(A)-3, Noida’S Din & Order No. Itba/Apl/M/250/2025-26/1076723333(1) Dated 04.06.2025, In Proceedings U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Heard Both The Parties At Length. Case File Perused.

property. It needs to be highlighted here that Sh. Om Parkash Gupta is father of Sh. Manoj Kumar Gupta and Sh. Mayank and Sh. Yash are grandsons of Sh. Om Parkash Gupta. An agreement was signed between Xi Sh. Anurag Pundeer (owner of land) and Sh. Manoj Kumar Gupta and Sh. Om Parkash Gupta on 12.11.2018 for development

SMT. SHANTI DEVI GOYAL,DEHRADUN vs. CIT()-3, NOIDA, DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2019-20] Acit Vs Smt. Shanti Devi Goyal 51/2, Rajpur Road, 14/1, New Road, Dehradun Dehradun, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand-248001 Pan-Adepg5850D Appellant Respondent [Assessment Year : 2019-20] Smt. Shanti Devi Goyal Vs Cit(Appeals)-3 14/1, New Road, Dehradun, Noida, Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand-248001 Pan-Adepg5850D Appellant Respondent Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Assessee By Shri Virendra Kalra, Ca Date Of Hearing 15.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 08.04.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Captioned Cross-Appeals Are Filed By The Revenue & Assessee Against The Order Dated 28.08.2024 By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-3, Noida [“Ld. Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising From The Assessment Order Dated 15.07.2021 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2019-20. Ita No.180 & 181/Ddn/2024

Income Tax Act, 1961, disregarding the valuation report of the Departmental Valuation Officer, which was based on personal inspection of the property and was of binding nature. 2. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A)-3, Noida has erred in estimating the value of property

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJPUR ROAD vs. SHANTI DEVI GOYAL, NEW ROAD

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2019-20] Acit Vs Smt. Shanti Devi Goyal 51/2, Rajpur Road, 14/1, New Road, Dehradun Dehradun, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand-248001 Pan-Adepg5850D Appellant Respondent [Assessment Year : 2019-20] Smt. Shanti Devi Goyal Vs Cit(Appeals)-3 14/1, New Road, Dehradun, Noida, Uttar Pradesh Uttarakhand-248001 Pan-Adepg5850D Appellant Respondent Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Assessee By Shri Virendra Kalra, Ca Date Of Hearing 15.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 08.04.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Captioned Cross-Appeals Are Filed By The Revenue & Assessee Against The Order Dated 28.08.2024 By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-3, Noida [“Ld. Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising From The Assessment Order Dated 15.07.2021 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2019-20. Ita No.180 & 181/Ddn/2024

Income Tax Act, 1961, disregarding the valuation report of the Departmental Valuation Officer, which was based on personal inspection of the property and was of binding nature. 2. Whether on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A)-3, Noida has erred in estimating the value of property