BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,173Delhi798Karnataka536Bangalore247Chennai212Kolkata194Ahmedabad138Jaipur121Pune99Telangana95Hyderabad59Chandigarh58Cochin44Cuttack43Surat42Calcutta39Indore38Visakhapatnam36Raipur34Lucknow33Rajkot30Nagpur28Amritsar20SC16Varanasi12Punjab & Haryana9Jodhpur8Kerala7Allahabad7Patna6Agra5Dehradun5Panaji3Jabalpur3Rajasthan3Orissa3Ranchi2Guwahati2Himachal Pradesh2Bombay1J&K1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1Uttarakhand1Andhra Pradesh1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 4024Section 20116Section 153C8Section 270A8Section 201(1)6Section 80I5Disallowance5Addition to Income5Deduction4Section 143(1)

KSHIPRA DHAWAN,SAHARANPUR vs. DCIT CEN CIR DDN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 171/DDN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 143(1)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40

section 201(1) of the Act, wherein, for non- deduction of TDS, the assessee is treated as deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. Therefore, in respect of the above disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, there is a provision for filing of the appeal which the assessee has filed and the same

KSHIPRA DHAWAN,SAHARANPUR vs. DCIT CEN CIR DDN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

3
TDS3
Section 270A(9)(a)2
ITA 170/DDN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 143(1)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40

section 201(1) of the Act, wherein, for non- deduction of TDS, the assessee is treated as deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. Therefore, in respect of the above disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, there is a provision for filing of the appeal which the assessee has filed and the same

RAJIV KUMAR TIWARI,SAHARANPUR vs. DCIT-ACIT- CEN CIR DDN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 157/DDN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2018-19 Rajiv Kumar Tiwari, Acit, Central Circle, A-7, Awas Vikas, Dehradun, Income Tax Office, 52/1, Delhi Road, Vs Rajpur Road, Dehradun Saharanpur, Uttarakhand-248001 Uttar Pradesh-247001 Pan-Adfpt9463L Appellant Respondent

Section 143(1)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40Section 44A

section 201(1) of the Act, wherein, for non-deduction of TDS, the assessee is treated as deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. Therefore, in respect of the above disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, there is a provision for filing of the appeal which the assessee has filed and the same

M/S. RASAYANA HOTEL,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, UTTRAKHAND

The appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2718/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Nov 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: The Ld. Cit (A) Was Partly

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 80I

260/-. M/s Rasayana Hotel Vs. ITO 2.1 The assesee’s appeal before the Ld. CIT (A) was partly allowed with the Ld. CIT (A) holding that the disallowance with respect to depreciation was not warranted. The Ld. CIT (A), however, upheld the disallowance of assessee’s claim u/s 80IC of the Act. The Ld. CIT (A) also upheld the action

M/S HIMALAYAN VACATIONS, P. LTD.,NANITAL vs. ACIT, HALDWANI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 43/DDN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwalm/S Himalayan Vacations Private Acit, Limited, Circle-2(1)(1), 01, Himalayan Vacations Private Vs. Haldawani. Limited, Tallital, Nainital-263002. Pan:Aacch5584P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Pavan Kumar Nath, Adv. Department By Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr

Section 250Section 270Section 270ASection 270A(9)Section 270A(9)(a)Section 274Section 9

260/-. The case was selected for limited scrutiny for examination of business expenses and after considering the submissions made by the assessee, a sum of Rs. 5,76,822/- was disallowed out of Sales Promotion Expenses and penalty proceedings u/s 270A of the Act were initiated for under reporting of income in consequence of misreporting. 2 IT No.43/DDN/2025 M/s Himalayan