BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 244A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai313Delhi223Bangalore90Ahmedabad48Kolkata29Cochin28Jaipur25Chennai18Allahabad16Chandigarh9Hyderabad8Indore7Rajkot5Lucknow5Pune5Dehradun2Patna2Cuttack2Ranchi2Karnataka2Telangana1Guwahati1Jodhpur1Amritsar1Panaji1SC1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)2

BG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DDIT/ADIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-1, DEHRADUN

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 31/DDN/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Dec 2020AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleasstt. Year 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra,Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

disallowed expenses on the reason that the 6 Stay No. 14/DDN/2020 assessee has not been able to produce the evidence regarding the incurrence of expenses and rendering of services to BGEPIL by relying on decision of 'the Dispute Resolution Panel/ Tribunal for earlier years The AO also rejected the contention of the assessee that all the services provided to BGEPIL

BG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DDIT/ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ) CIRCLE-1, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7/DDN/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Dec 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri V.P. Raoassessment Years: 2016-17

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, CIT/DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 44C

244A of the Act. Ground No. 16: General 16.1 The Appellant submits that the AO, TPO and DRP have erred in arriving various unwarranted and erroneous conclusions unsupported by any relevant material in deciding 16.2 The AO erred in initiating penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 16.3 The Appellant submits that each grounds of appeal