BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 2(71)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,678Delhi1,390Chennai443Bangalore337Ahmedabad332Hyderabad325Jaipur286Kolkata225Chandigarh184Pune163Indore112Raipur110Cochin102Surat96Lucknow67Rajkot60Allahabad59Visakhapatnam57Amritsar56Nagpur42Ranchi32Jodhpur31Agra29SC28Guwahati27Cuttack26Patna14Jabalpur13Varanasi9Dehradun7Panaji4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)7Section 9(1)(vii)6Section 80I4Deduction4Addition to Income4Section 1473Section 403Disallowance3Permanent Establishment3

REENA VERMA,HARIDWAR vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(5), ROORKEE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed as above

ITA 2215/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 May 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40ASection 68

disallowed these payments under section 40A(3) of the Act as there was no exceptional clause to make such payments in cash under Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules. Keeping in view the above facts, the AO rejected the books of accounts of the assessee under section 145(3) of the Act and applied net profit

ITO, WARD-1(3)(2), NEW DELHI vs. LAXMI ELECTRONICS, , HARIDQAR

Double Taxation/DTAA3
Section 143(2)2
Section 1482

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 4711/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Jun 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2009-10 Income-Tax Officer, Versus Laxmi Electronics, F-32, Ward 1(3)(2), New Delhi. Industrial Area, Haridwar. Pan:Aacfl6648R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. A.S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 22.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.06.2023 Order This Is An Appeal By The Revenue Against Order Dated 31.01.2017 Of Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), Agra (Camp At Dehradun) For The Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. In Ground No.1, The Revenue Has Challenged Deletion Of Addition Of Rs.2,57,71,163/- On Account Of Unconfirmed Purchases.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. A.S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 194CSection 40Section 80I

71,163/- on account of unconfirmed purchases. 3. Briefly, the facts relating to this issue are, the assessee is a partnership firm stated to be engaged in the manufacturing of PCB/electronic items. In the assessment year under dispute, the assessee filed its return of income on 24.09.2009 declaring nil income after claiming deduction under section 80IC of the Income

GULF PIPING COMPANY WLL,UNITED ARAB EMIRATES vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

ITA 81/DDN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. Nabin Ballodia, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mohan Lal Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 9(1)(vii)

71 & 81/DDN/2024 for A.Ys. 2020-21 and 2021-22 arise against the Assessing Officer’s assessment order dated 11.11.2022 and 24.08.2023 and ITA Nos. 83/DDN/2025 for A.Y. 2022-23, is directed against the Assessing Officer’s assessment order dated 23.12.2024, in proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), respectively. 2

GULF PIPING COMPANY WLL,ABU DHABI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

ITA 83/DDN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. Nabin Ballodia, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mohan Lal Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 9(1)(vii)

71 & 81/DDN/2024 for A.Ys. 2020-21 and 2021-22 arise against the Assessing Officer’s assessment order dated 11.11.2022 and 24.08.2023 and ITA Nos. 83/DDN/2025 for A.Y. 2022-23, is directed against the Assessing Officer’s assessment order dated 23.12.2024, in proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), respectively. 2

GULF PIPING COMPANY WLL,UNITED ARAB EMIRATES vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

ITA 71/DDN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. Nabin Ballodia, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mohan Lal Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 9(1)(vii)

71 & 81/DDN/2024 for A.Ys. 2020-21 and 2021-22 arise against the Assessing Officer’s assessment order dated 11.11.2022 and 24.08.2023 and ITA Nos. 83/DDN/2025 for A.Y. 2022-23, is directed against the Assessing Officer’s assessment order dated 23.12.2024, in proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”), respectively. 2

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. SHARDA EXPORTS, HARIDWAR

ITA 46/DDN/2022[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

2 The DCIT Vs. M/s Sharda Exports u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the Assessee on 08/06/2012for the year under consideration. An assessment order came to be passed on 29/09/2021 under Section 147/143(3) of the Act by making disallowance of Rs. 13,98,31,925/- on the ground that Duty Draw Back occurred during the year cannot

M/S THDC INDIA LIMITED, RISHIKESH,RISHIKESH vs. PCIT, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 69/DDN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun24 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 270ASection 80

2\n3.\n4.\n2.1. The incomes are directly and inextricably linked with the power\ngenerating business and cannot be disentitled from the benefit of\n80-1A deduction\n2.2. The Hon'ble CIT(A) has completely ignored the detailed\nsubmissions made by the Appellant in this regard and blindly\nfollowed the orders of its predecessors.\nThat on the facts and circumstances