BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,366Mumbai2,046Bangalore847Kolkata741Chennai553Jaipur367Ahmedabad302Chandigarh233Hyderabad221Pune186Raipur155Indore135Surat128Nagpur111Lucknow91Agra75Guwahati70Visakhapatnam66Cuttack61Karnataka52Rajkot49Amritsar45Calcutta40Cochin36Jodhpur34SC18Telangana17Allahabad16Ranchi15Jabalpur14Patna12Varanasi10Dehradun5Rajasthan5Kerala5Panaji4Himachal Pradesh3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1Orissa1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)6Section 14A4Disallowance4Addition to Income4Section 43B3Section 143(3)3Section 1422Deduction2

ACIT, NAINITAL vs. M/S. KUMAON MANDAL VIKAS NIGAM LTD., NAINITAL

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed as above

ITA 908/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 142Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(va)

disallowance made on account of delay in payments of Employee Contributions to PF and ECGI. There is delay in payment of Employees’ Contributions to provident fund trust and group insurance aggregating to Rs.76,22,211/- and Rs.8,26,865/- respectively. The AO had taxed the same in accordance with the provisions of Section 2(24)(x

ACIT, CIRCLE- 3, NAINITAL vs. KUMAON MANDAL VIKAS NIGAM LTD., NAINITAL

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed as above

ITA 1200/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 142Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(va)

disallowance made on account of delay in payments of Employee Contributions to PF and ECGI. There is delay in payment of Employees’ Contributions to provident fund trust and group insurance aggregating to Rs.76,22,211/- and Rs.8,26,865/- respectively. The AO had taxed the same in accordance with the provisions of Section 2(24)(x

HIMANSHU SHUKLA,RUDRAPUR vs. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX , BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 30/DDN/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Aug 2023AY 2018-2019
Section 139(1)Section 154Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(iv)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance made on account of employee’s contribution to Provident Fund and Employee State Insurance in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. 4. We have heard rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. This issue is no longer res integra in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme court in the case of Checkmate

BG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DDIT/ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE -1, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5/DDN/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Mar 2022AY 2017-2018
For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri T.S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92C

x. The factual matrix remaining same and in view of the remand report, the Panel finds no reason to differ with the above directions of the Panel for AY 2012-13. The objections of the assessee are rejected. However, the TPO is directed to restrict the adjustments to international transactions only.” 2.2 The same grounds were also taken

ACIT, CIRCLE- 2, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. SOLAR TURBINES INTERNATIONAL CO., BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 441/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Sh. Yogesh Kumar U.S.Assessment Year: 2014-15 Solar Turbines International Vs Dcit, Company (Singapore Branch Of Circle-2, Solar Turbines International International Taxation, Company, Usa), Dehradun. 14 Tractor Road, Singapore, C/O Delloitte Haskins & Sells Llp, Deloitte Centre Anchorage- Ii, Richmond Road, Bangalore. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aajcs3585J Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri T.S. Mapwal, Sr.DR
Section 2(43)Section 40Section 43BSection 90(2)

disallowed in the assessments for the year 1962-63 and onwards. 9. On the other hand, the Kolkata ITAT has delivered a judgment in the favour of revenue by relying on the Hon'ble Supreme Court's in the case of K. Srinivasan, 83 ITR 346 held that surcharge or "additional tax" would be included within the meaning of income