BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194C(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai515Delhi371Kolkata369Chennai189Bangalore188Ahmedabad60Hyderabad42Indore35Jaipur34Raipur33Rajkot31Nagpur14Pune13Amritsar13Karnataka13Visakhapatnam12Cuttack12Surat12Cochin11Chandigarh11Panaji10Lucknow9Allahabad9Guwahati8Ranchi7Kerala7Patna7Calcutta4Dehradun4Jodhpur3SC3Agra2Jabalpur1Gauhati1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1Rajasthan1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 406Section 234C2Section 143(3)2Section 194C2Permanent Establishment2Survey u/s 133A2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

ACIT, CIRCLE- 2, DEHRADUN vs. RAJESH BALLABH, DEHRADUN

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 44/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun19 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K.Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

Section 194CSection 201Section 40Section 44A

194C of the Act as they stood prior to 1/6/2015 and applicable for the assessment year 2014-15 and since the assessee satisfied the conditions required, he is not liable for disallowance of the amount under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Since the Ld. CIT(A) followed the binding precedents in applying the pre-amended provisions

ITO, WARD-1(3)(2), NEW DELHI vs. LAXMI ELECTRONICS, , HARIDQAR

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 4711/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: Disposed
ITAT Dehradun
22 Jun 2023
AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice- & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2009-10 Income-Tax Officer, Versus Laxmi Electronics, F-32, Ward 1(3)(2), New Delhi. Industrial Area, Haridwar. Pan:Aacfl6648R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. A.S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 22.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 22.06.2023 Order This Is An Appeal By The Revenue Against Order Dated 31.01.2017 Of Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), Agra (Camp At Dehradun) For The Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. In Ground No.1, The Revenue Has Challenged Deletion Of Addition Of Rs.2,57,71,163/- On Account Of Unconfirmed Purchases.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. A.S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 194CSection 40Section 80I

disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 7. Briefly, the facts are, in course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has paid an amount of Rs.3,92,550/- towards freight and Rs.1,28,000/- towards job work expenses. Being of the view that payments made are covered u/s. 194C

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1315/DEL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Dec 2023AY 2008-09
Section 143(3)Section 234C

7. In view of elaborate observations of the ld CIT(A) and in view of the consistency maintained by the assessee in returning the revenue using percentage of completion method and also in view of the same had been accepted by the ld AO himself in AYs 2007-08, 2009-10 and 2010-11, there is absolutely no reason

SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 873/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Dec 2023AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)Section 234C

7. In view of elaborate observations of the ld CIT(A) and in view of the consistency maintained by the assessee in returning the revenue using percentage of completion method and also in view of the same had been accepted by the ld AO himself in AYs 2007-08, 2009-10 and 2010-11, there is absolutely no reason