Search: disallowance | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 178clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai942 Delhi874 Bangalore297 Kolkata296 Chennai226 Ahmedabad213 Jaipur135 Hyderabad115 Indore86 Pune75 Chandigarh69 Raipur67 Cochin53 Lucknow41 Surat36 Ranchi35 Calcutta35 Guwahati29 Amritsar28 Allahabad25 Karnataka17 Telangana17 Cuttack17 Nagpur14 Visakhapatnam13 Jodhpur13 Rajkot12 SC8 Agra6 Dehradun6 Varanasi6 Patna6 Jabalpur3 Panaji2 Kerala1 Rajasthan1 MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1 Uttarakhand1 Punjab & Haryana1 Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)15 Section 36(1)(va)6 Section 43B4 Disallowance4 Section 139(1)3 Addition to Income3 Section 902 Section 2502 Depreciation2

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MDDA, TRANSPORT NAGAR DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as above

ITA 96/DDN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun21 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

178 and contended that the disallowance of Rs.28,080/- under section 43B r.w.s. 36(1)(va) of the Act was justified

MUSSOORIE DEHRADUN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,MDDA, TRANSPORT NAGAR DEHRADUN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as above

ITA 95/DDN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun21 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 43B

178 and contended that the disallowance of Rs.28,080/- under section 43B r.w.s. 36(1)(va) of the Act was justified

BHUPENDRA BORA,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 230/DDN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun02 Apr 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara(Through Video Conferencing) Bhupendra Bora, Vs. Dcit, Flat No. S4, Plot No. 618A, Circle-1(1)(1), Sector-1, Vaishali, Dehradun Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Ajkpb5486A Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shri A. S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 17/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 02/04/2025

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Rana, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 192Section 90

section 90 read with rule 128(9) is a procedural law and should not control the claim of FTC. 12. It was further submitted that even in the context of 80IA(7), 10A(5) etc, wherein there is specific provision for disallowance of deduction/exemption if audit report is not filed along with the return, various High Courts have taken

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), SUBHASH ROAD vs. UJVN LIMITED, GMS ROAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 126/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

178\n(SC) has confirmed the disallowance.\n9. Against the said order, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal wherein\nfollowing grounds of appeal are taken.\n“1. That having regard to the foots and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO/CPC in assuming jurisdiction

M/S UJVN LIMITED ,UTTARAKHAND vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UTTARAKHAND

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 127/DDN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Nov 2025AY 2024-25

Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

178\n(SC) has confirmed the disallowance.\n9.\nAgainst the said order, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal wherein\nfollowing grounds of appeal are taken.\n“1. That having regard to the foots and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred\nin law and on facts in confirming the action of Ld. AO/CPC in assuming jurisdiction

ITO, WARD-1(1)(3), DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN vs. TRISHLA STEEL PVT LTD, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 188/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun13 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

section 68 of the I.T. Act,\n1961 and the modus operandi of cash in hand as explained by the\nassessee has been found in contravention to the test human probability\nas discussed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sumati Dayal Vs\nCIT (214 ITR 801) and Durga Prasad More Vs CIT.\n\nGround