BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “disallowance”+ Section 14A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,329Delhi3,366Kolkata1,497Chennai1,481Ahmedabad959Bangalore826Pune475Hyderabad375Chandigarh239Jaipur193Karnataka158Indore139Cochin119Visakhapatnam107Lucknow87Raipur86Amritsar65Agra63Surat62Cuttack58Ranchi53Rajkot53Calcutta40Panaji34Guwahati30Nagpur28Telangana22Jodhpur17Varanasi12Jabalpur9Dehradun8Orissa6Punjab & Haryana5Kerala3SC3Patna2Allahabad1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 14A22Disallowance7Section 144C6Section 143(3)6Addition to Income6Section 36(1)(va)4Section 36(1)(viia)4Deduction3Section 1422

ACIT, NAINITAL vs. M/S. THE NAINITAL BANK LTD., UTTRAKHAND

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 6018/DEL/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun05 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Mr. Justice P.P. Bhatt & Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Bleassessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri N.C. Upadhyay, Senior DRFor Respondent: Shri K.R. Rastogi, FCA
Section 10Section 14ASection 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)

Section 14A of the Act. In this context, the relevant facts are that the AO disallowed a sum of Rs.1,55,24,593/- out of interest expenditure by invoking Rule 8D(2

ACIT, CIRCLE- 3, NAINITAL vs. KUMAON MANDAL VIKAS NIGAM LTD., NAINITAL

Section 1452
Section 802
Natural Justice2

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed as above

ITA 1200/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 142Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(va)

2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Act. The Ld. Senior Departmental Representative (hereinafter ‘Ld. DR’), placing reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services P. Ltd. [(2022) 448 ITR 518 (SC)], requested for upholding of the disallowances, to which the Ld. Counsel seemed to be in agreement

ACIT, NAINITAL vs. M/S. KUMAON MANDAL VIKAS NIGAM LTD., NAINITAL

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue are partly allowed as above

ITA 908/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 142Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36(1)(va)

2(24)(x) r.w.s. 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Act. The Ld. Senior Departmental Representative (hereinafter ‘Ld. DR’), placing reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services P. Ltd. [(2022) 448 ITR 518 (SC)], requested for upholding of the disallowances, to which the Ld. Counsel seemed to be in agreement

DCIT, RISHIKESH vs. M/S UTTRANCHAL IRON & ISPAT LTD.,, KOTDWAR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee (ITA No

ITA 2078/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 145Section 145(3)Section 80

disallowances under section 14A and 40A(3) of the Act and taxability of non-genuine sundry creditors are in dispute. 7. We have heard the Sr. DR and have perused the material available on the record. The section 145 of the Act reads as under: Uttranchal Iron & Ispat Ltd. “Method of accounting. 145. (1) Income chargeable under the head "Profits

UTTRANCHAL IRON & ISPAT LTD.,KOTDWAR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 1(4)(1), RISHIKESH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee (ITA No

ITA 4201/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 145Section 145(3)Section 80

disallowances under section 14A and 40A(3) of the Act and taxability of non-genuine sundry creditors are in dispute. 7. We have heard the Sr. DR and have perused the material available on the record. The section 145 of the Act reads as under: Uttranchal Iron & Ispat Ltd. “Method of accounting. 145. (1) Income chargeable under the head "Profits

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2300/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. T.S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 14A

disallowance u/s 14A. We find that the Assessing Officer has not invoked the necessary satisfaction in accordance with the provisions of section 14A (2

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2299/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Nov 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. T.S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 14A

disallowance u/s 14A. We find that the Assessing Officer has not invoked the necessary satisfaction in accordance with the provisions of section 14A (2

DCIT, CIRCLE- I, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. EXPRESS DRILLING SYSTEMS LLC, DEHRADUN

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee is partly

ITA 6114/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6114/Del/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम Dcit, Express Drilling Circle-1, Vs. Systems Llc, International Taxation, C/O Nangia & Co., 1St Floor, Ida, 46, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. E.C. Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Pan No.Aabce6891R अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & Cross Objection No. 13/Del/2018 (In I.T.A No.6114/Del/2017) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम Express Drilling Systems Llc, Dcit, Vs. C/O Nangia & Co., Circle-1, 1St Floor, Ida, 46, International Taxation, E.C. Road, Dehradun, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand. Pan No. Aabce6891R अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 234BSection 40

disallowing standby I.T.A.No.6114/Del/2017 & CO No. 13/Del/2018 charges totaling to Rs.54,600,000/- on the ground of business exigency and business prudence not proved by the appellant.” 2. In the cross objection filed by the assessee, the assessee challenged the validity of the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3)/144C r.w.s. 254 of the Income