BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 116clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,027Delhi998Bangalore395Kolkata332Chennai230Ahmedabad176Raipur110Jaipur106Hyderabad101Cochin89Chandigarh82Agra61Pune55Indore39Calcutta37Amritsar37Cuttack35Lucknow33Surat27Karnataka25Guwahati23Rajkot23Visakhapatnam18Ranchi16Jodhpur14Allahabad11Panaji8Nagpur8Varanasi7Telangana5SC4Patna3Dehradun3Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)10Section 36(1)(va)6Depreciation3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 2502

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), SUBHASH ROAD vs. UJVN LIMITED, GMS ROAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 126/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Nov 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

116/- on account of employees'\ncontribution to PF and ESI u/s 36(1)(va), is bad in law and against the facts and\ncircumstances of the case and the same is outside the purview of section 143(1) of the\nAct.\n4. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred

M/S UJVN LIMITED ,UTTARAKHAND vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UTTARAKHAND

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 127/DDN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun
27 Nov 2025
AY 2024-25
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

116/- on account of employees'\ncontribution to PF and ESI u/s 36(1)(va), is bad in law and against the facts and\ncircumstances of the case and the same is outside the purview of section 143(1) of the\nAct.\n4. That having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) has erred

BG EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INDIA LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DDIT/ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE -1, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5/DDN/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Mar 2022AY 2017-2018
For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri T.S. Mapwal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 92C

disallowing inventory written off of Rs.25,28,05,028 on the basis that the Appellant submitted only internal documents which do not suffice for allowance of expenditure. 7 9.2 The learned AO / DRP erred in not appreciating that amount of obsolete inventoiy written off was debited to the Profit and Loss Account which has been audited by an independent auditor