BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai887Delhi733Bangalore374Kolkata247Ahmedabad176Chennai172Indore150Pune130Jaipur125Hyderabad115Chandigarh87Cochin80Lucknow77Agra73Visakhapatnam58Surat42Raipur36Nagpur29Guwahati26Jodhpur25Rajkot24Amritsar22Patna21Jabalpur11Panaji10Cuttack8Allahabad8Karnataka6Dehradun3SC2Telangana2Varanasi2Punjab & Haryana2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 15410Section 80P5Section 250(5)4Section 143(1)3Business Income2Rectification u/s 1542

LAKSAR CO OPERATIVE CANE DEV. UNION LTD.,LAKSAR vs. ITO, W- 1(3)(4), ROORKEE, ROORKEE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 121/DDN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun07 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 250(5)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s 80P was, being beyond the purview of Sec. 143(1)(a), a mistake apparent on record liable to be rectified u/s 154, hence the Id. CIT(A) is not justified and correct in dismissing the appeal filed against the rejection order dt. 27.07.2021 of application dt. 23.02.2021 u/s 154 against the Intimation order

BG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DDIT/ADIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-1, DEHRADUN

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed and stay application filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 31/DDN/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Dec 2020AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleasstt. Year 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra,Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

disallowed expenses on the reason that the 6 Stay No. 14/DDN/2020 assessee has not been able to produce the evidence regarding the incurrence of expenses and rendering of services to BGEPIL by relying on decision of 'the Dispute Resolution Panel/ Tribunal for earlier years The AO also rejected the contention of the assessee that all the services provided to BGEPIL

SH. ARJUN SINGH,ROORKEE vs. CIT, DEHRADUN

Appeal is allowed

ITA 102/DDN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Amarpal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 154

u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). 2. Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have taken recourse to section 154 rectification for the purpose of disallowing