BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai923Delhi744Bangalore376Kolkata247Chennai177Indore155Ahmedabad139Pune106Jaipur101Hyderabad98Chandigarh76Lucknow75Agra69Cochin42Surat42Visakhapatnam40Raipur34Nagpur29Rajkot25Jodhpur21Amritsar20Patna20Guwahati18Jabalpur11Panaji10Allahabad8Cuttack7Karnataka6Dehradun4SC2Punjab & Haryana2Telangana2Varanasi2Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)13Section 15410Section 36(1)(va)6Section 80P5Section 250(5)4Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 2502Rectification u/s 1542Depreciation

LAKSAR CO OPERATIVE CANE DEV. UNION LTD.,LAKSAR vs. ITO, W- 1(3)(4), ROORKEE, ROORKEE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 121/DDN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun07 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 250(5)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s 80P was, being beyond the purview of Sec. 143(1)(a), a mistake apparent on record liable to be rectified u/s 154, hence the Id. CIT(A) is not justified and correct in dismissing the appeal filed against the rejection order dt. 27.07.2021 of application dt. 23.02.2021 u/s 154 against the Intimation order

2

SH. ARJUN SINGH,ROORKEE vs. CIT, DEHRADUN

Appeal is allowed

ITA 102/DDN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Amarpal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 154

u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). 2. Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have taken recourse to section 154 rectification for the purpose of disallowing

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), SUBHASH ROAD vs. UJVN LIMITED, GMS ROAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 126/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Nov 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

u/s 143(1) and that too without providing a reasonable opportunity of being\nheard in accordance with law to the assessee.\n5. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the\ngrounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without\nprejudice to each other.”\n10. Heard both

M/S UJVN LIMITED ,UTTARAKHAND vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UTTARAKHAND

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 127/DDN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 Nov 2025AY 2024-25
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

u/s 143(1) and that too without providing a reasonable opportunity of being\nheard in accordance with law to the assessee.\n5. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the\ngrounds of appeal at the time of hearing and all the above grounds are without\nprejudice to each other.”\n10.\nHeard both