BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi955Mumbai792Chennai366Bangalore278Kolkata160Ahmedabad84Jaipur49Raipur46Chandigarh39Amritsar37Hyderabad26Visakhapatnam21Pune19Cochin19Indore18Lucknow16SC13Karnataka13Rajkot12Guwahati10Cuttack7Dehradun6Agra4Surat3Kerala3Panaji3Nagpur3Patna2Ranchi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 54B7Section 143(3)6Section 9(1)(vii)6Permanent Establishment5Double Taxation/DTAA3Section 234C2Survey u/s 133A2

GULF PIPING COMPANY WLL,ABU DHABI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

ITA 83/DDN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. Nabin Ballodia, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mohan Lal Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 9(1)(vii)

Permanent Establishment in India (PE) of the non- resident in India, the same cannot be taxed. We have Bangalore in the case of ABB FZ-LLC which was a case rendered in the context of DTAA between India and UAE. The decision of the CIT(A) is in line with the decision referred to above and is a correct interpretation

GULF PIPING COMPANY WLL,UNITED ARAB EMIRATES vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

ITA 71/DDN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun
14 Jan 2026
AY 2021-22

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. Nabin Ballodia, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mohan Lal Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 9(1)(vii)

Permanent Establishment in India (PE) of the non- resident in India, the same cannot be taxed. We have Bangalore in the case of ABB FZ-LLC which was a case rendered in the context of DTAA between India and UAE. The decision of the CIT(A) is in line with the decision referred to above and is a correct interpretation

GULF PIPING COMPANY WLL,UNITED ARAB EMIRATES vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

ITA 81/DDN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Sh. Nabin Ballodia, CA &For Respondent: Sh. Mohan Lal Joshi, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 9(1)(vii)

Permanent Establishment in India (PE) of the non- resident in India, the same cannot be taxed. We have Bangalore in the case of ABB FZ-LLC which was a case rendered in the context of DTAA between India and UAE. The decision of the CIT(A) is in line with the decision referred to above and is a correct interpretation

DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN vs. M/S. SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO. LTD., GURGAON

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1315/DEL/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Dec 2023AY 2008-09
Section 143(3)Section 234C

Permanent Establishment (PE) and income computed at profit rate of 25% thereof. While doing so, the ld AO rejected the books of account and rejected book results shown by the assessee. In AY 2008-09, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the file of the ld AO with regard to determination of profit for outsource supply vide its order

SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 873/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Dec 2023AY 2012-13
Section 143(3)Section 234C

Permanent Establishment (PE) and income computed at profit rate of 25% thereof. While doing so, the ld AO rejected the books of account and rejected book results shown by the assessee. In AY 2008-09, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the file of the ld AO with regard to determination of profit for outsource supply vide its order

SH. DEVENDRA DUTT PANT,HARIDWAR vs. DCIT , UTTARKAHAND

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 149/DDN/2025[2106-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2106-2017

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 54BSection 54E

permanent or temporary nature? 7) Whether the land, though entered in revenue records, had never been actually used for 8 Devendra Dutt Pant agriculture, that is, it had never been ploughed or tilled? Whether the owner meant or intended to use it for agricultural purposes? 8) Whether the land was situate in a developed area? Whether its physical characteristics, surrounding