Search: condonation of delay

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 37(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1478 Section 153A6 Section 805 Condonation of Delay5 Section 1484 Natural Justice4 Section 143(3)2 Section 80I2 Section 28

RAJESH AGGARWAL ,DEHRADUN vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 199/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

condone the delay and admit the appeals of the assessee for adjudication. 2. As identical issues are involved in all these appeals, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. AY: 2011-12 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: That the Order passed

RAJESH AGGARWAL ,DEHRADUN vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

USHA GARG,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEHRADUN

RAJESH AGGARWAL ,DEHRADUN vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

USHA GARG,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEHRADUN

USHA GARG,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEHRADUN

GYANENDRA PANWAR,DEHRADUN vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC BENGALURU, BENGALURU

SH. NITIN SINGHAL,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, U.S.NAGAR

MASCOT FASTNERS PRIVATE LIMITED,UTTARAKHAND vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, -

PURAN SINGH NEGI,HALDWANI vs. THE ASSIST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , NANITAL

BALWINDER SINGH,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, KHATIMA

BALWINDER SINGH,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, W-2(3)(5), , KHATIMA