BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 285clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka100Mumbai59Delhi53Kolkata39Hyderabad34Panaji32Chennai30Jaipur24Pune24Surat18Indore14Lucknow12Ahmedabad11Chandigarh9Bangalore8Cuttack8Raipur8Varanasi6Amritsar6Allahabad5Guwahati5Cochin5Kerala4Rajkot4Dehradun4SC3Agra2Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Calcutta1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 808Section 80I6Section 143(3)4Section 144C2Section 92C2Section 92B2Transfer Pricing2Deduction2Comparables/TP

SH. MAHADEV SHIKARI,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, RUDRAPUR

ITA 222/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

sections 271AAC1 and 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC has refused to condone 285 and 280 days’ delay

MAHADEV SHIKARI,UDHAM SINGH NAGAR vs. ITO, RUDRAUR

ITA 220/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

sections 271AAC1 and 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC has refused to condone 285 and 280 days’ delay

2
Penalty2

KARAM SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED,SITARGANJ vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5), UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and that of the Stay Applications are dismissed

ITA 24/DDN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Nageshwar Rao, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Pramod Verma, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80Section 80ISection 92BSection 92C

Delay condoned. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) passed by the High Court. In view of this, we find no merit in the appeals and special leave petitions. Accordingly, the appeals and special leave petitions are dismissed.” 25. The doctrine of merger results

KARAM SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED,UDHAM SINGH NAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5), UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and that of the Stay Applications are dismissed

ITA 3/DDN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Nageshwar Rao, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Pramod Verma, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80Section 80ISection 92BSection 92C

Delay condoned. Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties. We do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) passed by the High Court. In view of this, we find no merit in the appeals and special leave petitions. Accordingly, the appeals and special leave petitions are dismissed.” 25. The doctrine of merger results