BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 270A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai107Chennai84Chandigarh67Ahmedabad63Pune57Jaipur50Delhi42Bangalore32Hyderabad30Lucknow27Cochin25Kolkata25Patna21Indore19Visakhapatnam16Surat16Rajkot12Raipur10Cuttack9Nagpur9Jabalpur5Dehradun4Agra3Allahabad2Guwahati2Panaji2Amritsar2Jodhpur2SC1Varanasi1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 1474Penalty4Section 270A2Section 42Condonation of Delay2

SH. MAHADEV SHIKARI,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, RUDRAPUR

ITA 222/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

sections 271AAC1 and 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC has refused to condone 285 and 280 days’ delay

MAHADEV SHIKARI,UDHAM SINGH NAGAR vs. ITO, RUDRAUR

ITA 220/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

sections 271AAC1 and 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC has refused to condone 285 and 280 days’ delay

BALWINDER SINGH,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, KHATIMA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 16/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 147Section 270ASection 4

270A of the Act dated 28.09.2022 for Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the assessee, vide his letter, dated 17.02.2025 stated that he has opted to settle the tax dispute of Rs.19,37,997/- relating to the tax arrears vide order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated

BALWINDER SINGH,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, W-2(3)(5), , KHATIMA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 15/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh

Section 147Section 270ASection 4

270A of the Act dated 28.09.2022 for Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the assessee, vide his letter, dated 17.02.2025 stated that he has opted to settle the tax dispute of Rs.19,37,997/- relating to the tax arrears vide order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act dated