BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 201(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai380Delhi309Mumbai301Bangalore233Pune142Nagpur132Karnataka129Kolkata124Jaipur104Ahmedabad101Raipur58Cochin51Visakhapatnam45Hyderabad45Indore36Surat33Panaji30Chandigarh29Kerala17Rajkot14Lucknow12Cuttack12Varanasi12Jodhpur10Dehradun9Patna8SC6Amritsar5Agra5Calcutta4Guwahati3Jabalpur3Andhra Pradesh2Rajasthan1Telangana1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 20128Section 201(1)12Section 234E10Deduction6Section 200A4TDS3Natural Justice3Condonation of Delay2

HASEEN,HARIDWAR vs. I T O ,WARD 1(3)(1),, HARIDWAR

In the result, the Appeal of the Appellant is partly allowed for

ITA 95/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthihaseen Vs Ito 38, Gadowali, Bahadarpur Jat, Ward 1(3)(1), Income Tax Haridwar-249404 Office, Yogi Bhawan, Industrial Pan: Aodph1131G Area, Haridwar, Uttarakhand (Applicant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Pankaj Goel, Adv Respondent By Sh. Akash Barnwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 07.04.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 15 .04.2026 Order Per Yogesh Kumar, U.S. Jm: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.

Section 144BSection 147

condone the delay of 201 days in filing the present Appeal. 3 Haseen vs. ITO 6. Brief facts of the case are on merit are that, an assessment order came to be passed on 22/03/2022 u/s 147 r.w. S 144 read with Section

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,MIYANWALA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 103/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

3. Per contra, the Ld. Department's Representative submitted that, there is no sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay in filing the captioned Appeals, thus sought for dismissal of the present Appeals on delay in latches. 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record on the issue of delay in filing the present

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD SAHASPUR, DEHRADUN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 101/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

3. Per contra, the Ld. Department's Representative submitted that, there is no sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay in filing the captioned Appeals, thus sought for dismissal of the present Appeals on delay in latches. 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record on the issue of delay in filing the present

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD MAJRA, DEHRADUN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 102/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

3. Per contra, the Ld. Department's Representative submitted that, there is no sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay in filing the captioned Appeals, thus sought for dismissal of the present Appeals on delay in latches. 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record on the issue of delay in filing the present

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD BHOGPUR, DEHRADUN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 100/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

3. Per contra, the Ld. Department's Representative submitted that, there is no sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay in filing the captioned Appeals, thus sought for dismissal of the present Appeals on delay in latches. 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record on the issue of delay in filing the present

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED RANIPOKHRI,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 99/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

3. Per contra, the Ld. Department's Representative submitted that, there is no sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay in filing the captioned Appeals, thus sought for dismissal of the present Appeals on delay in latches. 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record on the issue of delay in filing the present

FAMILY WELFARE CENTRE,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 84/DDN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Dr. Smriti SaxenaFor Respondent: Sh. Pramod Kumar Verma, CIT DR
Section 154Section 201

section 201(1A) of the Act.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed appeal before the first appellate authority with a delay of 15 months. The assessee submitted application for condonation

ASTLEY CONSTRUCTION,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (TDS), DEHRADUN

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 47/DDN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & (Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 234E

3. The return of TDS were filed late as partner looking after the tax matter was not attending business due to ill health as per the submissions made by the assessee vide letter dated ‘NIL’ and received on 15/1/2021 by the Registry of the Tribunal. The same is taken on record. The late filing fees

ASTLEY CONSTRUCTION,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (TDS), DEHRADUN

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 46/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & (Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 234E

3. The return of TDS were filed late as partner looking after the tax matter was not attending business due to ill health as per the submissions made by the assessee vide letter dated ‘NIL’ and received on 15/1/2021 by the Registry of the Tribunal. The same is taken on record. The late filing fees