BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 201clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai373Delhi305Mumbai295Bangalore235Pune147Ahmedabad133Nagpur132Karnataka130Jaipur125Kolkata121Cochin98Hyderabad58Raipur58Visakhapatnam56Chandigarh39Surat34Cuttack32Panaji30Indore29Kerala19Jodhpur17Lucknow13Varanasi12Rajkot12Dehradun9Agra8Patna7SC6Amritsar5Calcutta4Ranchi4Guwahati3Jabalpur3Andhra Pradesh2Telangana1Rajasthan1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 20128Section 201(1)12Section 234E10Deduction6Section 200A4Natural Justice3TDS3Condonation of Delay2

HASEEN,HARIDWAR vs. I T O ,WARD 1(3)(1),, HARIDWAR

In the result, the Appeal of the Appellant is partly allowed for

ITA 95/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthihaseen Vs Ito 38, Gadowali, Bahadarpur Jat, Ward 1(3)(1), Income Tax Haridwar-249404 Office, Yogi Bhawan, Industrial Pan: Aodph1131G Area, Haridwar, Uttarakhand (Applicant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Pankaj Goel, Adv Respondent By Sh. Akash Barnwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 07.04.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 15 .04.2026 Order Per Yogesh Kumar, U.S. Jm: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.

Section 144BSection 147

condone the delay of 201 days in filing the present Appeal. 3 Haseen vs. ITO 6. Brief facts of the case are on merit are that, an assessment order came to be passed on 22/03/2022 u/s 147 r.w. S 144 read with Section

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,MIYANWALA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 103/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

condone the delay of294, 202, 263, 324 and 324 days respectively in filing the captioned Appeals by the Assessee. 6. Brief facts of the case are that, orders under Section 201

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD MAJRA, DEHRADUN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 102/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

condone the delay of294, 202, 263, 324 and 324 days respectively in filing the captioned Appeals by the Assessee. 6. Brief facts of the case are that, orders under Section 201

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD BHOGPUR, DEHRADUN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 100/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

condone the delay of294, 202, 263, 324 and 324 days respectively in filing the captioned Appeals by the Assessee. 6. Brief facts of the case are that, orders under Section 201

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED RANIPOKHRI,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 99/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

condone the delay of294, 202, 263, 324 and 324 days respectively in filing the captioned Appeals by the Assessee. 6. Brief facts of the case are that, orders under Section 201

DISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD SAHASPUR, DEHRADUN,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT, C C DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeals of the Appellant are partly allowed for

ITA 101/DDN/2026[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Apr 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 201(1)

condone the delay of294, 202, 263, 324 and 324 days respectively in filing the captioned Appeals by the Assessee. 6. Brief facts of the case are that, orders under Section 201

FAMILY WELFARE CENTRE,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 84/DDN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Dr. Smriti SaxenaFor Respondent: Sh. Pramod Kumar Verma, CIT DR
Section 154Section 201

section 201(1A) of the Act.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed appeal before the first appellate authority with a delay of 15 months. The assessee submitted application for condonation

ASTLEY CONSTRUCTION,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (TDS), DEHRADUN

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 46/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & (Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 234E

section 201(1A) came w.e.f. 1.6.2015 giving powers to levy the fees for late filing of TDS returns while doing processing u/s 201(1A) and the returns submitted/processed prior to this date were not subject to imposition of late filing fees. Such powers were not vested till the amendment made on 1.6.2015. Reliance is placed on following cases wherein

ASTLEY CONSTRUCTION,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (TDS), DEHRADUN

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 47/DDN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & (Through Video Conferencing)

Section 200ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 234E

section 201(1A) came w.e.f. 1.6.2015 giving powers to levy the fees for late filing of TDS returns while doing processing u/s 201(1A) and the returns submitted/processed prior to this date were not subject to imposition of late filing fees. Such powers were not vested till the amendment made on 1.6.2015. Reliance is placed on following cases wherein