BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 17(2)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi564Chennai540Mumbai385Bangalore246Kolkata243Ahmedabad179Jaipur170Hyderabad152Karnataka149Chandigarh121Pune104Surat102Raipur100Nagpur96Amritsar85Indore77Cuttack55Rajkot49Calcutta39Panaji39Lucknow38SC32Visakhapatnam30Cochin26Varanasi14Telangana12Patna12Dehradun9Allahabad8Guwahati8Jodhpur6Orissa5Rajasthan4Agra4Himachal Pradesh4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 10(46)25Section 1020Section 119(2)(b)10Section 808Section 153A6Section 80I6Condonation of Delay6Section 45Section 10(45)

KARAM SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED,SITARGANJ vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5), UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and that of the Stay Applications are dismissed

ITA 24/DDN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Nageshwar Rao, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Pramod Verma, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80Section 80ISection 92BSection 92C

iv) Fourthly, upon the amalgamating company ceasing to exist, it cannot be regarded as a person under Section 2(31) of the Act 1961 against whom assessment proceedings can be initiated or an order of assessment passed; (v) Fifthly, a notice under Section 143 (2) was issued on 26 September 2013 to the amalgamating company, SPIL, which was followed

5
Exemption5
Limitation/Time-bar2
Transfer Pricing2

KARAM SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED,UDHAM SINGH NAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5), UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and that of the Stay Applications are dismissed

ITA 3/DDN/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Nageshwar Rao, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Pramod Verma, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80Section 80ISection 92BSection 92C

iv) Fourthly, upon the amalgamating company ceasing to exist, it cannot be regarded as a person under Section 2(31) of the Act 1961 against whom assessment proceedings can be initiated or an order of assessment passed; (v) Fifthly, a notice under Section 143 (2) was issued on 26 September 2013 to the amalgamating company, SPIL, which was followed

RAJESH AGGARWAL ,DEHRADUN vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 199/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Jun 2023AY 2013-14
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

IV [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’], Kanpur, pertaining to assessment years 2011-12 to 2016- 17. 2. At the outset, we find there is a delay of 2 days in filing the appeals by the assessee. Considering the small duration of delay, we are inclined to condone the delay and admit the appeals of the assessee for adjudication. 2

SHRI VIBHU GROVER,KOTDWARA vs. PCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 110/DDN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwalvibhu Grover, Pcit, M/S Grover Sales Corporation, Dehradun. Garage Road, Kotdwara, Vs. Pauri-246169 Pan:Agdpg5842R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Anil Jain, Adv. Department By Shri S.K. Chaterjee, Cit-Dr

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 263

Delay condoned. This special leave petition is misconceived and is completely contrary to the law pertaining to Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The notice under Section 148 of the 1961 Act referred to two reasons. The first reason was with regard to non-declaration of the account in ING Vysya Bank with a credit of Rs.70

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (E), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 3192/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Arora, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(45)Section 10(46)Section 119(2)(b)Section 4

section 4 of the Water (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act, 1974, with duties and functions of prevention and control of pollution in terms of various pollution controlling acts, viz. Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1998, etc. 4. The assessee has applied for exemption

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (E), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 3194/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Arora, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(45)Section 10(46)Section 119(2)(b)Section 4

section 4 of the Water (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act, 1974, with duties and functions of prevention and control of pollution in terms of various pollution controlling acts, viz. Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1998, etc. 4. The assessee has applied for exemption

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 5092/DEL/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Jan 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Arora, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(45)Section 10(46)Section 119(2)(b)Section 4

section 4 of the Water (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act, 1974, with duties and functions of prevention and control of pollution in terms of various pollution controlling acts, viz. Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1998, etc. 4. The assessee has applied for exemption

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (E), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 3193/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Arora, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(45)Section 10(46)Section 119(2)(b)Section 4

section 4 of the Water (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act, 1974, with duties and functions of prevention and control of pollution in terms of various pollution controlling acts, viz. Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1998, etc. 4. The assessee has applied for exemption

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (E), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 3191/DEL/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Jan 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Arora, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(45)Section 10(46)Section 119(2)(b)Section 4

section 4 of the Water (Prevention & Control of pollution) Act, 1974, with duties and functions of prevention and control of pollution in terms of various pollution controlling acts, viz. Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Hazardous Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1998, etc. 4. The assessee has applied for exemption