BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna471Mumbai333Delhi222Chennai199Bangalore196Pune108Kolkata105Chandigarh89Ahmedabad81Hyderabad74Jaipur64Surat45Nagpur40Indore39Lucknow37Visakhapatnam33Cochin33Raipur27Rajkot20Agra18Amritsar12Cuttack12Jodhpur10Jabalpur9Guwahati9SC9Panaji6Ranchi5Allahabad2Varanasi2Dehradun2

Key Topics

Section 1542Section 2012Section 1442

MR. AMAN AGARWAL,RUDRAPUR vs. ITO, RUDRAPUR

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 237/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwali.T.A. No. 237/Ddn/2024 (A.Y 2017-18) Mr.Aman Agarwal Vs. Income Tax Officer Plot No. B 06, Street No. 02, 2(1)(4)(, Rudrapur, Income Near Shiv Mandir, Model Tax Office, Rudrapur- Colony, Rudrapur, 263153, 263153, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Pan: Aoppa3091L Appellant Respondent Assessee By None Revenue By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 08/08/2025

Section 144Section 147Section 154Section 69A

Section 144 of Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by computing the income of the Assessee at Rs. 1,01,70,730/- as against returned income of Rs. 3,23,730/- by making an addition of Rs. 98,47,000/- u/s 69A of the Act on account of cash 2 Aman Agarwal VS. ITO deposits/credits. Aggrieved by the assessment

FAMILY WELFARE CENTRE,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 84/DDN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Dr. Smriti SaxenaFor Respondent: Sh. Pramod Kumar Verma, CIT DR
Section 154Section 201

154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"] and as upheld by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) -Dehradun [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)") is bad at law and void ab initio 2. That on the facts and in circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT (A) Legal Ground erred in dismissing