MUKUL GARG,HARIDWAR vs. ITO, ROORKEE

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwali.T.A. No. 32/Ddn/2025 (A.Y 2021-22) Mukul Garg, Vs. Income Tax Officer 383/1, Jadugar Road, Civil Roorkee Lines, Roorkee H. O., Uttarakhand Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India, 247667 Pan: Afdpg7612J Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Rajiv Sahni, Ca Revenue By Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 07/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 13/08/2025

u/s 154 of the Act dated29/07/2022, the Assessee preferred Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) with a delay of 514 days. The Assessee in his application for condonation of delay filed before the Ld. CIT(A) assigned following reason:- ‘we had accepted addition for Rs. 36190/- and had deposited due tax on it along with disapproving the demand on balance

MR. AMAN AGARWAL,RUDRAPUR vs. ITO, RUDRAPUR

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for