SH. NITIN SINGHAL,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, U.S.NAGAR

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwali.T.A. No. 08/Ddn/2024 (A.Y 2015-16) Sh. Nitin Singhal Vs. Ito Matta Garg & Co. Chartered U.S. Nagar Accountants, 15, Astley Hall, Ward-2(2)(4), Bajpur, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Udhamsingh Nagar, Pan: Aqwps4877P Uttarakhand, 262401

condone the delay of 777 days in filing the present Appeal. 7. Brief facts of the case are that, return of income was filed declaring total income of Rs. 5,37,830/-. An addition of Rs. 2,25,000/- was made in original order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) passed

MS UTTARAKHAND PURV SAINIK KALYAN NIGAM LITD.,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, captioned appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar Us & Shri Manish Agarwal

delay in filing the captioned appeals is condoned and the appeals are heard on merits. 5. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that in case of the assessee itself in ITA No.725/Del/2017 for AY 2013-14 vide order dated 19.03.2025, the appeal of the assessee was ITA Nos.21 to 24/DDN/2025 dismissed by Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT

M/S UTTARAKHAND PURV SAINIK KALYAN NIGAM LIMITED,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, captioned appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar Us & Shri Manish Agarwal

delay in filing the captioned appeals is condoned and the appeals are heard on merits. 5. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that in case of the assessee itself in ITA No.725/Del/2017 for AY 2013-14 vide order dated 19.03.2025, the appeal of the assessee was ITA Nos.21 to 24/DDN/2025 dismissed by Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT

M/S UTTARAKHAND PURV SAINIK KALYAN NIGAM LIMITED,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, captioned appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar Us & Shri Manish Agarwal

delay in filing the captioned appeals is condoned and the appeals are heard on merits. 5. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that in case of the assessee itself in ITA No.725/Del/2017 for AY 2013-14 vide order dated 19.03.2025, the appeal of the assessee was ITA Nos.21 to 24/DDN/2025 dismissed by Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT

M/S. UTTARAKHAND PURV SAINIK KALYAN NIGAM LTD. ,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, W-1(1)(3), DDN, DEHRADUN

In the result, captioned appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar Us & Shri Manish Agarwal

delay in filing the captioned appeals is condoned and the appeals are heard on merits. 5. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that in case of the assessee itself in ITA No.725/Del/2017 for AY 2013-14 vide order dated 19.03.2025, the appeal of the assessee was ITA Nos.21 to 24/DDN/2025 dismissed by Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT

K L D A V COLLEGE,ROORKEE, HARIDWAR vs. ITO WARD 1(3)(4), ROORKEE, HARIDWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

exemption claimed u/s 11 of the Act without appreciating the facts that delay in furnishing of Audit Report is condonable

ROOP CHAND SHARMA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,ROORKEE vs. ITO(E), DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed

Bench: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Exemption, 175, 0 Saket Colony, Vs. Dehradun. Roorkee, Uttarakhand-24766 PAN-AABTR0035P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Rajiv Sahni, CA Department by Shri Aman Pal Singh, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 07/08/2025 Date of Pronouncement 14/08/2025 O R D E R PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM: This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Addl./Jt. Commissioner of Income

LITTLE SCHOLAR PRATHMIK VIDHYALAYA SHIKSHA SANSTHAN,KASHIPUR vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara(Through Video Conferencing) Little Scholar Prathmik Vs. Cit(E), Vidhyalaya Shiksha Samiti, Lucknow Bhalla Farm,Ramnagar, Kashipur, Uttarakhand 244713 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aaaal2930K Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 18/03/2025

Exemption), Lucknow [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(E)’, in short] dated 29.02.2024. 2. At the outset, we find that the appeal preferred by the assessee before us is delayed by 56 days. Considering the reason adduced in the condonation

SWAMI SATYAPRAKASHNAND SHIV MANDIR TRUST,UDHAM SINGH NAGAR vs. AO (EXEMPTION), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year: 2022-23 Swami Satyaprakashanand Vs. Income Tax Officer, Shiv Mandir Trust, Kali Kotdwar Mandir, Bareilley Haldwani (Uttrakhand) Bye Pass Road, Kishanpur, Udham Singh Nagar Uttarakhand Pin: 263148 Pan No. Aants6873L (Appellant) (Respondent)

condone the delay in filing Form 10. 7. From examination of record, in light of aforesaid rival submission, it is crystal clear that appellant/assessee filed return of income for assessment year 2022-23 on 16.08.2022 wherein assessee claimed exemption

PURAN SINGH NEGI,HALDWANI vs. THE ASSIST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , NANITAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 33/Ddn/2020 (A.Y 2016-17)

exemptions the assessee is due for and discharge the Demand raised by the Ld.AO The appellant craves for leave to add, alter, amend and / or modify any of the grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing the Appeal.” 3. There is a delay of two months in filing the present appeal. The Ld. AR has filed

MEENAKSHI KUMAR,DEHRADUN vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Kul Bharat[Through Video Conferencing] [Assessment Year : 2015-16] Meenakshi Kumar, Vs Pr.Cit, C/O-Matta Garg & Co., Dehradun. 15, Astley Hall, Dehradun, Uttarakhand-248001. Pan-Agipk3345G Appellant Respondent Appellant By None Respondent By Shri N.S.Jangpangi, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 27.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 27.07.2023 Order Per Kul Bharat, Jm : The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2015-16 Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Pr. Cit-1, Dehradun Dated 09.03.2020. 2. The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal:-

delay in filing the appeal is hereby, condoned and the appeal is admitted for hearing. 7. Facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the assessee e-filed his return of income on 03.02.2016 declaring total income of INR 2,44,310/-. The case was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) accepting

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (E), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv)/ 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] w.r.e in terms of power vested with CBDT/CIT(E) and its authority u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, along with and application for condonation of delay

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (E), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv)/ 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] w.r.e in terms of power vested with CBDT/CIT(E) and its authority u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, along with and application for condonation of delay

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (E), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv)/ 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] w.r.e in terms of power vested with CBDT/CIT(E) and its authority u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, along with and application for condonation of delay

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv)/ 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] w.r.e in terms of power vested with CBDT/CIT(E) and its authority u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, along with and application for condonation of delay

UTTARAKHAND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION & POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,DEHRADUN vs. ITO (E), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

exemption u/s 10(23C)(iv)/ 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act, for short] w.r.e in terms of power vested with CBDT/CIT(E) and its authority u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, along with and application for condonation of delay

NAINITAL DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK,HALDWANI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, HALDWANI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

condonation petition giving the reasons for the delay. This appeal has been listed for hearing on 27.07.2021, 28.09.2021, 01.12.2021, 08.02.2022, 27.04.2022, 29.06.2022, 23.08.2022, 12.10.2022, 20.02.2023, 20.06.2023, 25.07.2023, 20.09.2023 and on 19.10.2023. On none of these occasions, there was any representation from the side of the assessee nor any adjournment request has been filed. The Ld. DR also placed on record

NAINITAL DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK,HALDWANI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, HALDWANI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

condonation petition giving the reasons for the delay. This appeal has been listed for hearing on 27.07.2021, 28.09.2021, 01.12.2021, 08.02.2022, 27.04.2022, 29.06.2022, 23.08.2022, 12.10.2022, 20.02.2023, 20.06.2023, 25.07.2023, 20.09.2023 and on 19.10.2023. On none of these occasions, there was any representation from the side of the assessee nor any adjournment request has been filed. The Ld. DR also placed on record