Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2635 Section 143(3)2 Cash Deposit2 Demonetization2 Condonation of Delay2

SMT. MADHU GUPTA,U.S.NAGAR vs. PR.CIT, BAREILLY

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 136/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun21 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Yogesh Kumar Us & Sh. Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: Sh. Prashant Kacker, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Poonam Sharma, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 263

condone the delay of 1,181 days in filing the present Appeal subject to Assessee depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- to Prime Minister National Relief Fund. 3 Smt. Madhu Gupta 6. Brief facts of the case are that, Assessment for Assessment Year 2017-18 was completed on 16/12/2019 u/s 143(3) of the Income

SH. VINOD PANWAR,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, KOTDWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 40/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2017-18] Shri Vinod Panwar, Vs Ito, 7, Mohanpur, Prem Nagar, Kotdwar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand-248001 Dehradun, Pan-Akppp5733Q Uttarakhand Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri S.K.Ahuja, Ar Revenue By Shri A.S.Rana, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 09.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 09.07.2025 Order

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A

condone the delay and admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication. 5. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual, having proprietorship firm namely M/s. Eureka Services and filed his return of income on 23.01.2018, declaring total income of INR 6,27,020/-. The case of assessee was selected for scrutiny and as proper details were