BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

68 results for “condonation of delay”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai3,086Mumbai3,081Delhi2,668Kolkata2,021Pune1,203Bangalore1,186Ahmedabad1,055Hyderabad982Jaipur737Chandigarh533Indore401Surat390Patna378Raipur346Lucknow330Cochin286Visakhapatnam275Amritsar264Rajkot245Nagpur238Agra203Cuttack190Karnataka185Panaji142Calcutta123Guwahati74Jodhpur70Dehradun68Jabalpur64Allahabad44Telangana38Ranchi27SC27Varanasi20Kerala7Rajasthan6Andhra Pradesh6Orissa6Himachal Pradesh3Punjab & Haryana1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Addition to Income58Condonation of Delay33Section 143(3)23Section 14422Section 153A22Section 153C21Section 14720Natural Justice19Section 148

RAJESH AGGARWAL ,DEHRADUN vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 199/DDN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Jun 2023AY 2013-14
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 68

condone the delay and admit the appeals of the assessee for adjudication. 2. As identical issues are involved in all these appeals, they are taken up together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. AY: 2011-12 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: That the Order passed

SH. SANJAY KUMAR,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(3), DEHRADUN

Showing 1–20 of 68 · Page 1 of 4

18
Section 689
Limitation/Time-bar9
Section 69A8

In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 84/DDN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Sanjay Kumar Vs Income Tax Officer, 34 34Shankerpurhukumatpur Ward 1(2)(3), Dehradun, 248197, Uttarakhand, Uttarakhand Pan: Aaubpk4159P Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Rajiv Sahini, Ca Revenue By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Jcit, Dr Date Of Hearing 11/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2025

Section 143(3)Section 69

delay of 167 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, an assessment order came to be passed on 15/12/2018 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making an addition

MUKUL GARG,HARIDWAR vs. ITO, ROORKEE

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 32/DDN/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun13 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwali.T.A. No. 32/Ddn/2025 (A.Y 2021-22) Mukul Garg, Vs. Income Tax Officer 383/1, Jadugar Road, Civil Roorkee Lines, Roorkee H. O., Uttarakhand Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India, 247667 Pan: Afdpg7612J Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Rajiv Sahni, Ca Revenue By Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 07/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 13/08/2025

Section 154Section 154A

condonation of delay filed before the Ld. CIT(A) assigned following reason:- ‘we had accepted addition for Rs. 36190/- and had deposited due tax on it along with disapproving the demand on balance addition for Rs. 1617447.00. We were waiting for a fresh order, which never came against 3 Mukul Garg Vs. ITO the demand on the income

JASPAL SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(2), DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 268/DDN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making certain additions. Jaspal Singh Vs. ITO Consequent to the assessment order an order of penalty also came to be passed on 26/08/2024 u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Aggrieved by the assessment order and order of penalty, Assessee preferred two Appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) with a delay

JASPAL SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. ITO WARD1(1)(2) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 269/DDN/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making certain additions. Jaspal Singh Vs. ITO Consequent to the assessment order an order of penalty also came to be passed on 26/08/2024 u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. Aggrieved by the assessment order and order of penalty, Assessee preferred two Appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) with a delay

ABHISHEK AGARWAL,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, W01(1)(1), DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 103/DDN/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun12 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwalita No.104/Ddn/2025 (Assessment Year 2015-16) Abhishek Agarwal, Income Tax Officer, Near Town Area Office, Ward-1(1)(1), Doiwala, Distt Dehradun, Vs. Dehradun. Uttarakhand-248140. Pan-Alzpa7733L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Department By Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 12/09/2025

Income Tax Act, 1961.” 3. After considering the facts and the prayer of the assessee, we find that there was bonafide and sufficient reason regarding delay in filing the appeal. Under these circumstance and by respectfully following the judgement of hon’ble supreme court relied upon by the assessee, the delay is condoned and appeal of assessee is admitted

SLO AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD.,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 6509/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Jan 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Slo Automobiles Private Dy. Cit, Limited, Circle-2, Dehradun. 108-Haridwar Road, Vs. Dehradun-248001. Pan-Aancs8160M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 43B

condone the delay of 197 days in filing the present Appeal. SLO Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT 5. Brief facts of the case are that, the Assessee filed return of income declaring income of Rs. 6,46,975/- after adjusting the loans of earlier years, NIL taxable income has been reported. During the course of survey conducted by the Commercial

SH. ARVIND SINGH ,RISHIKESH vs. ITO, RISHIKESH, RISHIKESH

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 183/DDN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 144BSection 147

delay of 88 days in filing the present Appeal is hereby condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, an assessment order came to be passed on 24/03/2023under Section 147 r.w. Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by computing the income of the Assessee at Rs. 78,68,110/- as against the returned income

MOHD SHAZAD,HARIDWAR vs. ITO, ROORKEE

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 139/DDN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

delay of 340 days in filing the Appeal is hereby condoned. 3. Brief facts of the case are that, an assessment order came to be passed on 20/12/2018 by computing the income of the Assessee at Rs. 1,32,97,981/-, as against the returned income of Rs. 8,30,910/- by making certain addition

RAJESH AGGARWAL,DEHRADUN vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 205/DDN/2019[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. C. N. Prasad & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing) Rajesh Aggarwal, Vs. Dcit, B-4, New Sabzi Mandi, Vikash Central Circle, Nagar, Distti. Dehradun Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aanpa7592E Assessee By : Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Revenue By: Shri A. S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 24/08/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 15/09/2023

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sahni, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69A

addition of surrendered income during the course of search operations in this Assessment Year whereas the Appellant has distributed the income surrendered in Ass. Years 2011-12 to 2017-18, thereby the same income has been taxed twice. Rajesh Aggarwal 4. The appellant, therefore, pray that the appeal may be admitted and orders may be passed rendering justice

SH. NITIN SINGHAL,U.S.NAGAR vs. ITO, U.S.NAGAR

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is dismissed

ITA 8/DDN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwali.T.A. No. 08/Ddn/2024 (A.Y 2015-16) Sh. Nitin Singhal Vs. Ito Matta Garg & Co. Chartered U.S. Nagar Accountants, 15, Astley Hall, Ward-2(2)(4), Bajpur, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Udhamsingh Nagar, Pan: Aqwps4877P Uttarakhand, 262401

Section 263

condone the delay of 777 days in filing the present Appeal. 7. Brief facts of the case are that, return of income was filed declaring total income of Rs. 5,37,830/-. An addition

SH. AJAY KUMAR ,ROORKEE vs. CIT(A), 2-, ROORKEE, ROORKEE

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 182/DDN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun04 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Income Tax (Appeals)- Noida-3 (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short), Delhi dated 27/08/2024for the Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. Brief facts of the case are that, an assessment order came to be passed on29/03/2022 by making certain additions. Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 29/03/2022, the Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) with a delay

MR. RAKESH SHARMA,DELHI vs. ACIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 39/DDN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun12 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 139(1)Section 153C

condoned the delay in filing the appeals and taken them for adjudication. 5. Before us, the Ld. AR of the assessee requested that the Appeal No.39/DDN/2024 for Assessment Year 2013-14 be taken as a lead case as it contained entire argument put fourth by both the parties before the lower authorities, therefore, we first take up the appeal

MR. RAKESH SHARMA,DELHI vs. ACIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 40/DDN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun12 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 139(1)Section 153C

condoned the delay in filing the appeals and taken them for adjudication. 5. Before us, the Ld. AR of the assessee requested that the Appeal No.39/DDN/2024 for Assessment Year 2013-14 be taken as a lead case as it contained entire argument put fourth by both the parties before the lower authorities, therefore, we first take up the appeal

MR. RAKESH SHARMA,DELHI vs. ACIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 38/DDN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun12 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 139(1)Section 153C

condoned the delay in filing the appeals and taken them for adjudication. 5. Before us, the Ld. AR of the assessee requested that the Appeal No.39/DDN/2024 for Assessment Year 2013-14 be taken as a lead case as it contained entire argument put fourth by both the parties before the lower authorities, therefore, we first take up the appeal

DHAREMENDRA SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, W-2(1)(4), , RUDRAPUR

In the result, the Appeal of the Appellant is partly allowed for

ITA 6/DDN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun09 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 143(3)

Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making certain additions. The Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) which has been dismissed on 21/11/2023 vide order impugned. As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the Assessee preferred the present Appeal. 3. There is a delay of 352 days in filing the present Appeal. The Assessee

JASBIR SINGH,KHATIMA, U.S. NAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, RUDRAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 96/DDN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun12 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

Section 147Section 250Section 253

Income Tax Act Dt. 09/06/2023 was send on such e-mail address and was not known to the appellant unless someone from the department informed the appellant in this regards on mobile and thereafter he started working on the unknown subject which was heather to dealt by his father (died on 07/10/2013) and Late S Gopal Singh a close relative

HORRAWAL KISAN SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, the Appeal of the Appellant is partly allowed for

ITA 204/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwali.T.A. No. 204/Ddn/2024 (A.Y 2017-18) Horrawal Kisan Sewa Sahkari Vs. Income Tax Officer Samiti Limited, Horawala Fss Ward-1(1)(3) Harawala, Post Horrawal, Dehradun Dehradun 248001, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Pan: Aagfh4362L Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Suhil Kumar, Adv Revenue By Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 08/08/2025

Section 144

condone the delay of 149 days in filing the present Appeal. 6. An assessment order came to be passed on 18/11/2019 u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making certain additions

ANNU KUMAR,ROORKEE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DERHADUN

In the result, the Appeal of the Appellant is partly allowed for

ITA 79/DDN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun10 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Annu Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer, C/O. Hemant Arora & Co. Subhash Road, Llp 354-B, 30 Civil Lines, Dehradun, Roorkee Roorkee, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand Pan: Bttpk3087N Appellant Respondent Assessee By Sh. Pavitra Arora, Ca Revenue By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 10/07/2025 Order

Section 144Section 144B

Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) by making certain additions. The Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) which has been dismissed for delay in latches on27/02/2025 vide order 2 Annu Kumar Vs. ITO impugned. As against the order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 27/02/2025, the Assessee preferred the present Appeal. 3. The Ld. Counsel

GUNJAN JAISWAL,HALDWANI vs. ITO, WARD-2(1)(1), HALDWANI

In the result, the Appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed for

ITA 116/DDN/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 271(1)(C)Section 69A

addition of Rs. 1,22,00,000/- u/s 69A of the Act. Consequent to the said assessment order, an order of penalty also came to be passed u/s 271(1)(C) of the Act on 21/09/2022. Aggrieved by the assessment order as well as order of penalty, the Assessee preferred two Appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) with a delay