BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 34clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka529Delhi511Mumbai456Chennai261Bangalore184Pune159Jaipur115Ahmedabad96Hyderabad77Kolkata74Chandigarh67Surat60Cochin58Lucknow52Indore44Nagpur34Amritsar34Allahabad34Jodhpur29Visakhapatnam28Cuttack27Raipur18Agra17Calcutta17Panaji15Rajkot12Telangana12SC8Varanasi6Kerala5Rajasthan3Jabalpur3Dehradun3Punjab & Haryana2Andhra Pradesh2Patna2Orissa2Guwahati1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A22Section 115Section 1275Section 405Section 143(3)3Exemption3Section 122Section 1322Limitation/Time-bar2

INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH INDIA SOCIETY,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

Appeal is allowed

ITA 45/DDN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun13 Jun 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Institute Of Clinical Research Vs. Commissioner Of Income India Society, Tax (Appeals), 1St Floor, Building No.1, Dehradun Treenetra Vihar, Near Kargt Chowk, Dehradun Pan :Aabai3710P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr

Section 11Section 12ASection 194Section 194JSection 2(15)Section 40

34,480/- Rs.1,05,850/- Rs.3,06,457/- and accordingly he disallowed the entire payments on the ground that TDS under Section 194J have not been deducted and added to total income of the assessee. 4. Before the CIT(A), the assessee's contention was that the provision of Section 40(a)(ia) are not applicable in the case

DR. VIRENDRA SWAROOP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,KANPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 211/DDN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun16 Jan 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2023-24] Dr. Virendra Swaroop Vs Acit Educational Foundation Central Circle 15/96, Civil Lines, Kanpur Dehradun Uttar Pradesh-208001 Pan-Aaajd0224D Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Salil Kapoor, Adv. Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Shri Sumit Lal Chandanim, Adv. Shri Shivam Yadav, Adv. & Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16.01.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 16.09.2025 By Ld. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Kanpur [“Pcit”] Passed U/S 12(Ab)(4)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961[“The Act”] Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12A Of The Act From Assessment Year 2023-24 & Onwards.

Section 11Section 12Section 127Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 132Section 143(3)

34 of the impugned order, the ld. PCIT mentions, “it was noticed that the assessee trust has committed one or more specified violation. Thereafter, information was called for from the assessee trust by this letter dated 08.09.2022.” We are of the view that when Ld. PCIT was assuming jurisdiction under clause (a) to Section 12AB(4), then while calling

M/S SUSHILA DEVI CENTRE FOR PROFESSIONAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH,DEHRADUN vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), KANPUR (JAO- DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN), DEHRADUN

ITA 131/DDN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Oct 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 12Section 127Section 127(2)(a)Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)

Charitable Society v. PCIT, Central, ITA No. 1803/DEL/2024 at Page Nos. 156-187, Paragraphs 21 & 22 of the Case Law Compilation. 12. By the rule of strict construction and by the presumption against retrospectivity affirmed in CIT v. Vatika Township (P) Ltd (367 ITR 466, SC), such a provision cannot be applied to assessment years prior to its coming into