M/S SUSHILA DEVI CENTRE FOR PROFESSIONAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH,DEHRADUN vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), KANPUR (JAO- DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Trust Society v. PCIT(Central),\n[2025] 175 taxmann.com 671 (Delhi Trib.) [16-06-2025] at Page Nos: 315-328 of\nthe Case Law Compilation.\nc. Meenakshi Foundation v. PCIT, [2025] 175 taxmann.com 990 (Delhi-Trib.)\n(23-05-2025) at Page Nos. 329-342 of the Case Law Compilation.\n5. The order passed under Section 127(2

INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH INDIA SOCIETY,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Institute Of Clinical Research Vs. Commissioner Of Income India Society, Tax (Appeals), 1St Floor, Building No.1, Dehradun Treenetra Vihar, Near Kargt Chowk, Dehradun Pan :Aabai3710P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr

charitable activities have been recognised by the Department and a certificates under section 12A and 80G has also been granted by the competent authority. During the course of the scrutiny proceeding, the Assessing Officer on perusal of auditor's 2 | P a g e report enclosed with the return found that the assessee did not deduct TDS on certain amounts

DAWATE ISLAMI HIND UTTARAKHAND,FAIZAN E RAMZAN MASJID vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), PRATYAKSH KAR BHAWAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vimal Kumar & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singhassessment Year 2021-22 To 2023-24 Dawate Islami Hind Vs. Cit (Exemption) Uttarakhand, Faizan E Uttarakhand Ramzan Masjid, Jaspur, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand Pan No. Aadtd5207B (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 12AB of the Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Brief facts of the case are that applicant-assessee filed application in Form 10AB for registration on 30.09.2023 under Rules 17A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. A notice was issued to the applicant on 11.01.2024 and 08.02.2024 were issued but assessee failed to file reply. Therefore

VIVEKANAND VIDYAPITH TRUST,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD,DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara(Through Video Conferencing) M/S. Vivekanand Vidyapith Trust, Vs. Ito, Vivekanand Gram Jogiwala, Exemption Ward, Dehradun, Uttrakhand-248 001 Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaatv5303K Assessee By : Shri Somil Jain, Adv Shri Shrey Jain, Adv Revenue By: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 02/04/2025

2. Though the assessee has raised several grounds of appeal before us, the only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the Learned CPC was justified in denying the exemption under Section 11 of the M/s. Vivekanand Vidyapith Trust Act on the ground that assessee did not apply for fresh registration under the amended provisions

CHAUDHARY HARCHAND SINGH ATMA RAM EDUCATION TRUST,ROORKEE vs. CIT(E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No.6240/Del./2017: Asstt. Year: 2016-17 Chaudhary Harchand Singh Atma Vs Cit(E), Ram Education Trust, Lucknow C/O. Parikshit Aggarwal Fca, House No. 1238, Sec-22B, Chandigarh (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabtc2457J Assessee By : Sh. None Revenue By : Smt. Mayank Prabha Tomar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.12.2022

Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. That on the facts, circumstances and legal position of the case, the Worthy CIT has erred in rejecting the application of the appellant for grant of registration u/s 12AA of the Act even when the objects of the appellant are charitable in nature. Worthy CIT (A) further erred in not understanding

BHARTIYA KISSAN CHARITABLE CLUB TRUST,ROORKEE vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), DEHRADUN

In the result, ground relating to the addition of ₹ 15 lakhs as anonymous donation is allowed

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishia Y 2013-14 Appellant Respondent Bhartiya Kissan Charitable The Income Tax Officer Club Trust Vs. Exemptions Viil. Sultaur Dehradun Sabatwalli Roorkee 247667 Pan Aabtb6963G ( Appellant ) ( Respondent )

charitable trust formed as per trust deed dated 9/7/2009 with an initial contribution of ₹ 1000. The assessee filed return of income. However on perusal of the balance sheet of assessee, the learned assessing officer noted that assessee has introduced capital fund of Rs. 2279062/–, assessee was asked to explain the above introduction of capital. Assessee could not explain the credit

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI NARAYAN TRUST,SRINAGAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleshri Narayan Trust Vs Cit (Exemption), Lucknow Near Base Hospital, Srikot Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Ganganali, Up 226010 Srinagar (Gwl), 246174 Uttarakhand (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable purposes’ as defined in section 2(15) of the Act. V. The Appellant craves leave for reserving the right to amend, modify, alter, add or forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this appeal.” 3. The applicant society/trust filed an application for registration u/s 12A(a) of the Income

SRI GURU SINGH SABHA,NAINITAL vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

section 139(1) of the Act. Its case in other words is that the above compliance of filing of Form 10B tax audit report is mandatory in nature. We find no merit in the Revenue’s foregoing argument in principle in light of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust Vs. 2

SRI GURU SINGH SABHA,NAINITAL vs. ITO(EXEM), DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

section 139(1) of the Act. Its case in other words is that the above compliance of filing of Form 10B tax audit report is mandatory in nature. We find no merit in the Revenue’s foregoing argument in principle in light of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust Vs. 2

LITTLE SCHOLAR PRATHMIK VIDHYALAYA SHIKSHA SANSTHAN,KASHIPUR vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara(Through Video Conferencing) Little Scholar Prathmik Vs. Cit(E), Vidhyalaya Shiksha Samiti, Lucknow Bhalla Farm,Ramnagar, Kashipur, Uttarakhand 244713 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aaaal2930K Assessee By : None Revenue By: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 18/03/2025

2. At the outset, we find that the appeal preferred by the assessee before us is delayed by 56 days. Considering the reason adduced in the condonation petition, we are inclined to condone the delay in the interest of substantial justice and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite issuance of notice. Hence

RAJPUT PANCHAYAT DHARMSHALA,HARIDWAR, UTTRAKHAND vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

2) of the Income Tax Rules mandated filing of the audit report in Form 10B electronically. It was contended that there was no time limit prescribed for filing the ITR and the audit report in Form 10B. The Ld. AR further submitted that the section 12(1)(ba) of the Act was brought in the Statute from 01.04.2018. The section

RAJPUT PANCHAYAT DHARMSHALA,HARIDWAR, UTTRAKHAND vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

2) of the Income Tax Rules mandated filing of the audit report in Form 10B electronically. It was contended that there was no time limit prescribed for filing the ITR and the audit report in Form 10B. The Ld. AR further submitted that the section 12(1)(ba) of the Act was brought in the Statute from 01.04.2018. The section

K L D A V COLLEGE,ROORKEE, HARIDWAR vs. ITO WARD 1(3)(4), ROORKEE, HARIDWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

2)(b) of the Act is yet to be decided by the competent authority. 6. That without prejudice to the above the ADDL/JCIT has erred in law and facts in sustaining the addition for Rs. 1,82,59,837/- made by AO at CPC u/s 143(1)(ii) through automated process u/s 143(1) of the Income

CIVIL SERVICES INSTITUTE,DEHRADUN vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

Bench: Us:-

trust. (e) That the appellant society is not carrying out any activity of charitable nature. 2. That in any view of the matter and in any case, action of Ld. CIT(E) in rejecting the registration under section

THE ROTARY CLUB OF DEHRADUN CENTRAL CHARITABLE TRUST,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIT EXEMPTION

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: BEFORESHRI SUDHIR KUMAR (Judicial Member), SHRI AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA (Accountant Member)

Charitable Trust F-103, Dehradun Platinum Paradise Residency Dehradun PAN : AADTT8845R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sh. K. K. Juneja, Advocate Revenue by Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr.DR Date of hearing 09.05.2025 Date of 09.05.2025 pronouncement ORDER PER SUDHIR KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The assessee preferred the captioned appeal, challenging the order dated 28.08.2024 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption