CHAUDHARY HARCHAND SINGH ATMA RAM EDUCATION TRUST,ROORKEE vs. CIT(E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No.6240/Del./2017: Asstt. Year: 2016-17 Chaudhary Harchand Singh Atma Vs Cit(E), Ram Education Trust, Lucknow C/O. Parikshit Aggarwal Fca, House No. 1238, Sec-22B, Chandigarh (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabtc2457J Assessee By : Sh. None Revenue By : Smt. Mayank Prabha Tomar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.12.2022

13(4) of the Act. Reliance is also placed on CIT vs. Jamuna Lal Bajaj Seva Trust (1988) 171 ITR 568. On perusal of the financial statements, it is found that the applicant trust is primarily engaged in the business of providing medical services on a commercial basis with a motive of profit without providing any element of charity

DR. VIRENDRA SWAROOP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,KANPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2023-24] Dr. Virendra Swaroop Vs Acit Educational Foundation Central Circle 15/96, Civil Lines, Kanpur Dehradun Uttar Pradesh-208001 Pan-Aaajd0224D Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Salil Kapoor, Adv. Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Shri Sumit Lal Chandanim, Adv. Shri Shivam Yadav, Adv. & Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16.01.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 16.09.2025 By Ld. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Kanpur [“Pcit”] Passed U/S 12(Ab)(4)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961[“The Act”] Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12A Of The Act From Assessment Year 2023-24 & Onwards.

13 of the Act nor income from such profits and gains of the real estate business of sale, purchase and leasing activities can be termed as incidental to the attainment of trust's objectives and are in the nature of commercial activities carried out for purposes other than for the objects of the trust. Therefore, vide impugned order, ld. PCIT

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

RAJPUT PANCHAYAT DHARMSHALA,HARIDWAR, UTTRAKHAND vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Charitable Trust (2023) 150 taxmann.com 311(Surat Trib.) 4.2 The Ld. AR further submitted that had the AO treated both ITRs defective in accordance with the provisions of section 139(9) of the Act after affording atleast one opportunity to file Form 10B to cure the said defect; the assessee would have done the needful. Since there was no time

RAJPUT PANCHAYAT DHARMSHALA,HARIDWAR, UTTRAKHAND vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Charitable Trust (2023) 150 taxmann.com 311(Surat Trib.) 4.2 The Ld. AR further submitted that had the AO treated both ITRs defective in accordance with the provisions of section 139(9) of the Act after affording atleast one opportunity to file Form 10B to cure the said defect; the assessee would have done the needful. Since there was no time