BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 13(2)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,195Delhi1,099Chennai612Karnataka573Bangalore547Ahmedabad371Pune308Jaipur281Kolkata211Hyderabad195Chandigarh121Cochin101Surat94Indore93Rajkot89Lucknow73Amritsar66Cuttack52Visakhapatnam52Raipur42Allahabad38Nagpur35Agra35Telangana32Jodhpur30Calcutta26SC20Patna20Dehradun12Guwahati10Kerala10Varanasi9Punjab & Haryana6Rajasthan6Ranchi6Panaji5Jabalpur5Orissa3Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A39Section 153D20Section 1116Section 13914Exemption12Section 1279Section 143(3)8Section 153A8Charitable Trust8

DR. VIRENDRA SWAROOP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,KANPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 211/DDN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun16 Jan 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2023-24] Dr. Virendra Swaroop Vs Acit Educational Foundation Central Circle 15/96, Civil Lines, Kanpur Dehradun Uttar Pradesh-208001 Pan-Aaajd0224D Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Salil Kapoor, Adv. Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Shri Sumit Lal Chandanim, Adv. Shri Shivam Yadav, Adv. & Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16.01.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 16.09.2025 By Ld. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Kanpur [“Pcit”] Passed U/S 12(Ab)(4)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961[“The Act”] Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12A Of The Act From Assessment Year 2023-24 & Onwards.

Section 11Section 12Section 127Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 132Section 143(3)

2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by PCIT under section 12AB(4)(ii) of the Act cancelling the registration of the Appellant trust is illegal, bad in law and without jurisdiction. 3. That the reference made by the Assessing Officer ('AO') under the second proviso to Section 143(3) read

Addition to Income7
Section 1326
Search & Seizure5

M/S SUSHILA DEVI CENTRE FOR PROFESSIONAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH,DEHRADUN vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), KANPUR (JAO- DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 131/DDN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Oct 2025AY 2024-25
Section 127Section 127(2)(a)Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)

Trust v. CTT-1 & Ors SLP(C) No.\n13968/2015 dated 21.10.2016. It is mandatory required that the order passed under\nSection 127(2) of the Act that the senior authority must be in agreement to the said\ntransfer of assessing officer. The absence of disagreement doesn't meet the requirement\nof provisions of the Act. Hence, the order under Section

INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH INDIA SOCIETY,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

Appeal is allowed

ITA 45/DDN/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun13 Jun 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Institute Of Clinical Research Vs. Commissioner Of Income India Society, Tax (Appeals), 1St Floor, Building No.1, Dehradun Treenetra Vihar, Near Kargt Chowk, Dehradun Pan :Aabai3710P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr

Section 11Section 12ASection 194Section 194JSection 2(15)Section 40

2 | P a g e report enclosed with the return found that the assessee did not deduct TDS on certain amounts to which the various provisions of Sections 193 & 194 were applicable. The Assessing Officer held that in relation to the following payments, the assessee has failed to deduct TDS :- i) Payment made to Mrs. Suchita Chougule (architect)-Rs.52

CHAUDHARY HARCHAND SINGH ATMA RAM EDUCATION TRUST,ROORKEE vs. CIT(E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 6240/DEL/2017[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Dec 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No.6240/Del./2017: Asstt. Year: 2016-17 Chaudhary Harchand Singh Atma Vs Cit(E), Ram Education Trust, Lucknow C/O. Parikshit Aggarwal Fca, House No. 1238, Sec-22B, Chandigarh (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabtc2457J Assessee By : Sh. None Revenue By : Smt. Mayank Prabha Tomar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.12.2022

For Appellant: Sh. NoneFor Respondent: Smt. Mayank Prabha Tomar, Sr. DR
Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)

trust, are being made to the trustees including salary to society members who has been designated as Principal, which attracts the provisions of Section 13(1)(c) read with Section 13(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Book of Accounts and Vouchers were again called for on 29.06.2017, but were never produced for verification. 3. On perusal

VIVEKANAND VIDYAPITH TRUST,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD,DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 18/DDN/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara(Through Video Conferencing) M/S. Vivekanand Vidyapith Trust, Vs. Ito, Vivekanand Gram Jogiwala, Exemption Ward, Dehradun, Uttrakhand-248 001 Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaatv5303K Assessee By : Shri Somil Jain, Adv Shri Shrey Jain, Adv Revenue By: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 02/04/2025

For Appellant: Shri Somil Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)

2. Though the assessee has raised several grounds of appeal before us, the only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the Learned CPC was justified in denying the exemption under Section 11 of the M/s. Vivekanand Vidyapith Trust Act on the ground that assessee did not apply for fresh registration under the amended provisions

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 170/DDN/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Dec 2023AY 2011-12
Section 10Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 153CSection 153D

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 169/DDN/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Dec 2023AY 2010-11
Section 10Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 153CSection 153D

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 167/DDN/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Dec 2023AY 2008-09
Section 10Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 153CSection 153D

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 168/DDN/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun22 Dec 2023AY 2009-10
Section 10Section 127Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)Section 153CSection 153D

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

CIVIL SERVICES INSTITUTE,DEHRADUN vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

ITA 7593/DEL/2018[-]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023

Bench: Us:-

Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)

section 13(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. (b) That the applicant society is merely a closed group of individuals that pool money so as to cater to their materialistic and leisurely needs of only its member which definitely is not characteristic of an institution that exists on charitable lines. (c) That the assessee society is performing activities and services

RAJPUT PANCHAYAT DHARMSHALA,HARIDWAR, UTTRAKHAND vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

ITA 186/DDN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 11Section 12(1)(b)Section 12(1)(ba)Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 154

2) of the Income Tax Rules mandated filing of the audit report in Form 10B electronically. It was contended that there was no time limit prescribed for filing the ITR and the audit report in Form 10B. The Ld. AR further submitted that the section 12(1)(ba) of the Act was brought in the Statute from 01.04.2018. The section

RAJPUT PANCHAYAT DHARMSHALA,HARIDWAR, UTTRAKHAND vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

ITA 189/DDN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun27 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 11Section 12(1)(b)Section 12(1)(ba)Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 154

2) of the Income Tax Rules mandated filing of the audit report in Form 10B electronically. It was contended that there was no time limit prescribed for filing the ITR and the audit report in Form 10B. The Ld. AR further submitted that the section 12(1)(ba) of the Act was brought in the Statute from 01.04.2018. The section