M/S SUSHILA DEVI CENTRE FOR PROFESSIONAL STUDIES AND RESEARCH,DEHRADUN vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), KANPUR (JAO- DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN), DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Trust v. CTT-1 & Ors SLP(C) No.\n13968/2015 dated 21.10.2016. It is mandatory required that the order passed under\nSection 127(2) of the Act that the senior authority must be in agreement to the said\ntransfer of assessing officer. The absence of disagreement doesn't meet the requirement\nof provisions of the Act. Hence, the order under Section

INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL RESEARCH INDIA SOCIETY,DEHRADUN vs. CIT(A), DEHRADUN

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Institute Of Clinical Research Vs. Commissioner Of Income India Society, Tax (Appeals), 1St Floor, Building No.1, Dehradun Treenetra Vihar, Near Kargt Chowk, Dehradun Pan :Aabai3710P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By None Department By Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr

trust, is already entitled for section 11 exemption; and, therefore, we are of the considered view that such a disallowance made in its hands is not sustainable in light of tribunal’s coordinate bench’s order in ITA No. 4138/Mum/2011 [M/s. Mahatma Gandhi Seva Mandir Vs. DDIT(E), dated 11.05.2012], as under: “3. The relevant facts for adjudication of ground

VIVEKANAND VIDYAPITH TRUST,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD,DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara(Through Video Conferencing) M/S. Vivekanand Vidyapith Trust, Vs. Ito, Vivekanand Gram Jogiwala, Exemption Ward, Dehradun, Uttrakhand-248 001 Dehradun (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaatv5303K Assessee By : Shri Somil Jain, Adv Shri Shrey Jain, Adv Revenue By: Shri Amar Pal Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 18/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 02/04/2025

2. Though the assessee has raised several grounds of appeal before us, the only effective issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether the Learned CPC was justified in denying the exemption under Section 11 of the M/s. Vivekanand Vidyapith Trust Act on the ground that assessee did not apply for fresh registration under the amended provisions

RAJPUT PANCHAYAT DHARMSHALA,HARIDWAR, UTTRAKHAND vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

2) of the Income Tax Rules mandated filing of the audit report in Form 10B electronically. It was contended that there was no time limit prescribed for filing the ITR and the audit report in Form 10B. The Ld. AR further submitted that the section 12(1)(ba) of the Act was brought in the Statute from 01.04.2018. The section

RAJPUT PANCHAYAT DHARMSHALA,HARIDWAR, UTTRAKHAND vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed as above

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

2) of the Income Tax Rules mandated filing of the audit report in Form 10B electronically. It was contended that there was no time limit prescribed for filing the ITR and the audit report in Form 10B. The Ld. AR further submitted that the section 12(1)(ba) of the Act was brought in the Statute from 01.04.2018. The section

SRI GURU SINGH SABHA,NAINITAL vs. ITO (EXEMPTION), DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

2. It transpires during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from both the parties that learned lower authorities have held the assessee as not entitled for claiming section 11 exemption for having not filed its prescribed tax audit report in Form 10B on or before the due date of filing section 139(1) return, in the course

SRI GURU SINGH SABHA,NAINITAL vs. ITO(EXEM), DEHRADUN

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganesh(Through Video Conferencing)

2. It transpires during the course of hearing with the able assistance coming from both the parties that learned lower authorities have held the assessee as not entitled for claiming section 11 exemption for having not filed its prescribed tax audit report in Form 10B on or before the due date of filing section 139(1) return, in the course

CHAUDHARY HARCHAND SINGH ATMA RAM EDUCATION TRUST,ROORKEE vs. CIT(E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No.6240/Del./2017: Asstt. Year: 2016-17 Chaudhary Harchand Singh Atma Vs Cit(E), Ram Education Trust, Lucknow C/O. Parikshit Aggarwal Fca, House No. 1238, Sec-22B, Chandigarh (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aabtc2457J Assessee By : Sh. None Revenue By : Smt. Mayank Prabha Tomar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.12.2022

2,20,33,900/- and in addition to that Hostel Fee, Transportation Fees, Library Fees, and Registration Fee is also being levied from the students. Although huge income is being generated by the applicant from the Quadra Hospital, Quadra School of Nursing and Quadra Institute of Ayurveda, yet the expenditures of the applicant are primarily aimed at augmenting its business

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,KURUKSHETRA vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust running an educational institution under the name of Shri Krishna Institute of Technology and Shri Krishna Institute of Polytechnic. The assessee trust was granted registration on 09.12.1996. The trust has been approved for exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) of the Act by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula vide his order dated 30.10.2008 effective from

SHRI NARAYAN TRUST,SRINAGAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleshri Narayan Trust Vs Cit (Exemption), Lucknow Near Base Hospital, Srikot Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Ganganali, Up 226010 Srinagar (Gwl), 246174 Uttarakhand (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable purposes’ as defined in section 2(15) of the Act. V. The Appellant craves leave for reserving the right to amend, modify, alter, add or forego any ground(s) of appeal at any time before or during the hearing of this appeal.” 3. The applicant society/trust filed an application for registration u/s 12A(a) of the Income

K L D A V COLLEGE,ROORKEE, HARIDWAR vs. ITO WARD 1(3)(4), ROORKEE, HARIDWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Judicial Member), SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (Accountant Member)

2)(b) of the Act is yet to be decided by the competent authority. 6. That without prejudice to the above the ADDL/JCIT has erred in law and facts in sustaining the addition for Rs. 1,82,59,837/- made by AO at CPC u/s 143(1)(ii) through automated process u/s 143(1) of the Income