BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,434Delhi807Kolkata453Jaipur376Chennai326Ahmedabad294Bangalore212Surat207Hyderabad195Indore133Cochin111Pune110Chandigarh90Nagpur87Calcutta48Amritsar46Guwahati45Rajkot42Visakhapatnam37Lucknow32Panaji31Raipur31Agra21Cuttack20Jodhpur16Patna14Ranchi9Karnataka8Jabalpur7SC5Allahabad3Rajasthan3Telangana3Orissa2Varanasi2Dehradun2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 69A3Section 2502Addition to Income2

RITU SINGHAL,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 47/DDN/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun29 Oct 2025AY 2022-23
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250Section 69A

gains of business or profession\".\nSince the appellant's claim relates to salary payments, which are for the purpose of\nrunning the business, the disallowance does not stand. There is no evidence to suggest\nthat the expenditure was personal or capital in nature, which are the only grounds for\nthat disallowance under this section. Thus, the addition made

SHRI VARDHAN GHILDIYAL,DEHRADUN vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(5), DEHRADUN

The appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 18/DDN/2021[2017-2018]Status: Disposed
ITAT Dehradun
31 Mar 2022
AY 2017-2018

Bench: Sh. R.K.Panda & Sh. Anubhav Sharmash. Vardhan Ghildiyal Vs. Ito, Ca Mayank Kumar Aggarwal Ward 1(2) (5) 286A 1St Floor, Garhi Cantt. Dehradun Dakra Road, Dehradun- 248001 Pan – (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 69A

cash deposit has not been doubted by the AO, however the change in denomination of currency has been treated as generation of Income in the hands of appellant and moreover the unexplained income, resultant invoking taxability U/s 115BBE of IT Act 1961. 3) That the part addition upheld by the learned CIT(A) is based on conjecture and surmises