PRAKASHI UNIYAL,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, KOTDWAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishia Y 2009-10 Appellant Respondent Ms Praksahi Uniyal The Income Tax Officer F-27 Thdc Colony Vs. Kotdwar Ajabpur Dehradun Pan : Ccxpp8494E ( Appellant ) ( Respondent )

capital gain of ₹ 5 97967/– was computed and it was added to the total income of the assessee. The total income of the assessee was assessed at Rs. 19,16,367/– vide order dated 13/3/2014 passed under section 143 (3) read with section 147 of The Income Tax Act. 3 6. The assessee aggrieved with the order of the learned

ASSITANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , DEHRADUN vs. POWER MACHINES, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal preferred by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member), SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member)

gains amounting to INR 3,018,797/- at an arbitrary rate of 25%. 4 4. The Ld. AO. has erred in laws and facts in considering the nature of transactions and holding head office transactions as undisclosed income under section 69 of the Act. 5. The Ld. AO. has erred in laws and facts by not considering the evidences

SHRI CHHOTEY LAL VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

income and concealment. 6 ITAs. 3396 & 3397/DDN/2015 Shri Chhotey Lal Verma, Dehradun. 3.1. Further an amount of Rs. 33,50,000/- sale considweration has also been surrendered on sale of land at mauza dhakpatti sold through power of attorney. Total short term capital gains on the above sale amounting to Rs. 9,50,000/- is added as undisclosed

SHRI CHHOTEY LAL VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

income and concealment. 6 ITAs. 3396 & 3397/DDN/2015 Shri Chhotey Lal Verma, Dehradun. 3.1. Further an amount of Rs. 33,50,000/- sale considweration has also been surrendered on sale of land at mauza dhakpatti sold through power of attorney. Total short term capital gains on the above sale amounting to Rs. 9,50,000/- is added as undisclosed

MADHU SINGLA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishiyogesh Singla, Vs. Dcit, C/O. Matta Garg & Co, 15 Astley Central Circle, Hall, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Dehradun Pan: Bqaps5912C (Appellant) (Respondent) Madhu Singla, Vs. Dcit, C/O. Matta Garg & Co, 15 Astley Central Circle, Hall, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Dehradun Pan: Adwps5499J (Appellant) (Respondent)

capital gain etc. Search u/s 132 was conducted on 22.07.2015 on Golden Manor Group. During search, documents belonging to assessee were found. Notice u/s 142(1) was issued on 30.03.2017. In response to which assessee filed return on 14.8.2017 of Rs. 576240/-. 3. During the course of search father of assessee Sri. Thackur Singla surrendered Rs. 20 lacs

YOGESH SINGLA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishiyogesh Singla, Vs. Dcit, C/O. Matta Garg & Co, 15 Astley Central Circle, Hall, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Dehradun Pan: Bqaps5912C (Appellant) (Respondent) Madhu Singla, Vs. Dcit, C/O. Matta Garg & Co, 15 Astley Central Circle, Hall, Dehradun, Uttarakhand Dehradun Pan: Adwps5499J (Appellant) (Respondent)

capital gain etc. Search u/s 132 was conducted on 22.07.2015 on Golden Manor Group. During search, documents belonging to assessee were found. Notice u/s 142(1) was issued on 30.03.2017. In response to which assessee filed return on 14.8.2017 of Rs. 576240/-. 3. During the course of search father of assessee Sri. Thackur Singla surrendered Rs. 20 lacs

PARDEEP KUMAR WALIA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE , DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2023-24] Pradeep Kumar Walia Vs Dcit C/O-Matta Garg & Co. Central Circle 15, Astley Hall Dehradun Dehradun, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand-248001 Pan-Aabpw2423F Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri S.K.Matta, Ca Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 10.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 18.02.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.07.2025 By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-3, Noida [“Ld.Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Cit(Appeals) Noida-3/10009/2022-23 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising From The Assessment Order Dated 07.02.2025 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2023-24. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Individual & Filed His Return Of Income U/S 139(4) Of The Act On 04.11.2023, Declaring Total Income Of Inr 86,20,630/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass For The Reason That The Assessee Has Claimed Deduction U/S 54F Of The Act & Corresponding Capital Gain Was Not Declared In The Return Of Income Filed By The Assessee.

capital gain was not declared in the return of income filed by the assessee. 3. In the assessment order, AO observed that a search and survey action was carried out at the business premises of M/s. Mehta Brothers & Others Group of cases on 24.11.2022 and the resident of Shri Raj Lumba was also covered. During the course of search, certain

SHRI PURAN SINGH VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

capital gain earned has been surrendered in the return filed u/s 153A.He has disclosed total sale consideration of Rs.3,28,000/- on sale of khasra no. 317 i.e. 1/3 rd share during the year under assessment and remaining share has been surrendered by aditya verma and chottey lal verma in their returns of income. This means that total sale consideration

SHRI PURAN SINGH VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

capital gain earned has been surrendered in the return filed u/s 153A.He has disclosed total sale consideration of Rs.3,28,000/- on sale of khasra no. 317 i.e. 1/3 rd share during the year under assessment and remaining share has been surrendered by aditya verma and chottey lal verma in their returns of income. This means that total sale consideration

HEMANT DALAKOTE,HALDWANI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1)(1), HALDWANI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). 2. Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. 3. It emerges during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have added the alleged undisclosed short term capital gains

SUBHASH GUPTA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 131/Ddn/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Subhash Gupta, Vs Dcit, 46, Keshav Vihar, Majra, Central Circle, Dehradun-248171 Dehradun-248001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Acepg1378H Assessee By : Sh. H. S. Kushwaha, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. N. S. Jangpangi, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 05.01.2023

undisclosed income to the tune of Rs.3,723/-. 4. During the search action u/s 132 of the Act, cash of Rs. 20,45,400/- was found & seized from the locker of the appellant. During the course of search in his statement on oath u/s 132(4) of the Act, the appellant explained the source of said cash in answer

DR. VIRENDRA SWAROOP EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,KANPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2023-24] Dr. Virendra Swaroop Vs Acit Educational Foundation Central Circle 15/96, Civil Lines, Kanpur Dehradun Uttar Pradesh-208001 Pan-Aaajd0224D Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Salil Kapoor, Adv. Shri Rajiv Sahni, Ca Shri Sumit Lal Chandanim, Adv. Shri Shivam Yadav, Adv. & Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 16.01.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 16.09.2025 By Ld. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Kanpur [“Pcit”] Passed U/S 12(Ab)(4)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961[“The Act”] Cancelling The Registration Granted U/S 12A Of The Act From Assessment Year 2023-24 & Onwards.

gains of the real estate business of sale, purchase and leasing activities can be termed as incidental to the attainment of trust's objectives and are in the nature of commercial activities carried out for purposes other than for the objects of the trust. Therefore, vide impugned order, ld. PCIT has cancelled the registration granted u/s 12A/12AA or 12AB

RITU SINGHAL,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT , CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

gains of business or profession\".\nSince the appellant's claim relates to salary payments, which are for the purpose of\nrunning the business, the disallowance does not stand. There is no evidence to suggest\nthat the expenditure was personal or capital in nature, which are the only grounds for\nthat disallowance under this section. Thus, the addition made

MRS. DHOOMI DEVI,CHAMOLI vs. ITO, W-1(4)4, SRINAGAR, CHAMOLI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2022-23] Mrs. Dhoomi Devi Vs Ito C/O-Hotel Udai Palace Near . Ward-1(4)4 Narsingh Temple Srignagar, Chamoli Joshimath Chamoli, Uttarakhand-246174 Uttarakhand-246443 Pan-Adkpd6984B Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri Tarandeep Singh, Adv. Revenue By Shri A.S. Rana, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 13.02.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 08.08.2024 By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“Nfac”), Delhi [“Ld. Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Nfac/2021-22/10329482 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising From The Assessment Order Dated 05.03.2024 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144B Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2022-23. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That Assessee Is An Individual & The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass For Reason I.E. “Large Investment In Immovable Property As Compared To The Total Income”. The Ao Than Passed The Assessment Order U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144B On 05.03.2024 At A Total Income Of Inr 2,70,31,224/- As Against The Total Income Declared At Inr 29,45,000/- In The Return Of Income Filed By The Assessee.

income received is duly declared by the assessee. The assessee had sold one property jointly owned by her son for a total sum of INR 6.00 crores out of which assessee’s share was of INR 3.00 crores. Out of the long terms capital gains from the sale of said property, assessee claimed deduction u/s 54EC for investment in NHAI