Search: capital gains

2 results for “capital gains”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai221 Delhi99 Bangalore53 Chennai47 Kolkata30 Hyderabad21 Jaipur16 Indore9 Ahmedabad8 Amritsar8 Pune8 Surat4 Visakhapatnam3 Dehradun2

Key Topics

Section 808 Section 80I6 Section 143(3)4 Section 144C2 Section 92C2 Section 92B2 Transfer Pricing2 Deduction2 Comparables/TP2

KARAM SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED,SITARGANJ vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5), UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and that of the Stay Applications are dismissed

ITA 24/DDN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

For Appellant: Sh. Nageshwar Rao, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Pramod Verma, CIT DR

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80Section 80ISection 92BSection 92C

Method (“TNMM”). 7. Without prejudice to the above, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. TPO/AO/DRP erred in rejecting segmental profitability of sales made by the AE to the Appellant. 8. Without prejudice, on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. TPO/AO/DRP erred in using the entity level profits

KARAM SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED,SITARGANJ vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5), UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

KARAM SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED,SITARGANJ vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5), UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

KARAM SAFETY PRIVATE LIMITED,UDHAM SINGH NAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5), UDHAM SINGH NAGAR