BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 69Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai325Delhi291Jaipur165Ahmedabad153Bangalore85Hyderabad78Cochin63Chandigarh50Pune48Chennai45Indore40Surat36Amritsar33Rajkot27Nagpur21Kolkata20Visakhapatnam20Lucknow19Raipur16Jodhpur15Agra12Guwahati6Cuttack5Dehradun4Patna3SC2Varanasi2Jabalpur2Karnataka2Allahabad1Ranchi1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 69A8Section 115B5Addition to Income4Section 2502Section 143(3)2Section 1442Section 50C(2)2Capital Gains2Long Term Capital Gains2Cash Deposit

PARDEEP KUMAR WALIA,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE , DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 168/DDN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun18 Feb 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S & Shri Manish Agarwal[Through Virtual Mode] [Assessment Year : 2023-24] Pradeep Kumar Walia Vs Dcit C/O-Matta Garg & Co. Central Circle 15, Astley Hall Dehradun Dehradun, Uttarakhand Uttarakhand-248001 Pan-Aabpw2423F Appellant Respondent Assessee By Shri S.K.Matta, Ca Revenue By Ms. Poonam Sharma, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 10.12.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 18.02.2026 Order Per Manish Agarwal, Am : The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.07.2025 By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (A)-3, Noida [“Ld.Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Cit(Appeals) Noida-3/10009/2022-23 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“The Act”] Arising From The Assessment Order Dated 07.02.2025 Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Act Pertaining To Assessment Year 2023-24. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Individual & Filed His Return Of Income U/S 139(4) Of The Act On 04.11.2023, Declaring Total Income Of Inr 86,20,630/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass For The Reason That The Assessee Has Claimed Deduction U/S 54F Of The Act & Corresponding Capital Gain Was Not Declared In The Return Of Income Filed By The Assessee.

Section 115BSection 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 54FSection 69A
2

capital gain was not declared in the return of income filed by the assessee. 3. In the assessment order, AO observed that a search and survey action was carried out at the business premises of M/s. Mehta Brothers & Others Group of cases on 24.11.2022 and the resident of Shri Raj Lumba was also covered. During the course of search, certain

SHRI VARDHAN GHILDIYAL,DEHRADUN vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(5), DEHRADUN

The appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 18/DDN/2021[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Mar 2022AY 2017-2018

Bench: Sh. R.K.Panda & Sh. Anubhav Sharmash. Vardhan Ghildiyal Vs. Ito, Ca Mayank Kumar Aggarwal Ward 1(2) (5) 286A 1St Floor, Garhi Cantt. Dehradun Dakra Road, Dehradun- 248001 Pan – (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 69A

Capital Gain for equity shares. Apart from that Ld. AO noticed that during demonetization period a sum of Rs. 15,00,000/- was deposited in specified bank notes in account no. 3018008800012252 held with the Punjab National Bank. 3. The assessee explained that this amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- was withdrawn from same loan account on 23.09.2016. However

HEMANT DALAKOTE,HALDWANI vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1)(1), HALDWANI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 42/DDN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun23 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 50CSection 50C(2)

gains of Rs.24,15,000/- representing the difference between actual sale consideration and the stamp price of the corresponding four capital assets/sale deed 2 Hemant Dalakote executed on as many occasions in the relevant financial year involving aggregate sums of Rs.47,20,000/- and Rs.71,35,000/-; respectively. 4. The Revenue vehemently argues during the course of hearing that both

NIRMAL SINGH,KASHIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE

Appeal is partly allowed

ITA 36/DDN/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun13 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. Manish Agarwal

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Amar Pal Singh, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 144Section 69A

69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act as upheld in the lower appellate discussion. 4. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the assessee’s and the Revenue’s pleadings all along. A perusal of the assessment order at page 2 in para 4 suggest that the assessee has sold an immovable property declared sale consideration of Rs.60