BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 275(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi202Mumbai142Ahmedabad71Cochin58Chandigarh55Jaipur51Chennai49Bangalore26Raipur20Hyderabad15Kolkata13Nagpur12Pune11Indore9Visakhapatnam6Lucknow5Surat3Jodhpur3Dehradun2Amritsar2Ranchi1Cuttack1Allahabad1Patna1Guwahati1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 250(6)2Section 292C2Section 275(1)(a)2Section 271(1)(c)2Section 153A(1)(a)2Section 1322Penalty2Natural Justice2

SHRI ADITYA VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 3398/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 132Section 153A(1)(a)Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)Section 275(1)(a)Section 292C

275(1)(a) of the Act have not been appreciated which state that where the appeal is pending before the Hon’ble ITAT, the penalty proceedings should not be disposed of till the time specified under the said Section. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred

SHRI ADITYA VERMA,DEHRADUN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 3399/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Jan 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 132Section 153A(1)(a)Section 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)Section 275(1)(a)Section 292C

275(1)(a) of the Act have not been appreciated which state that where the appeal is pending before the Hon’ble ITAT, the penalty proceedings should not be disposed of till the time specified under the said Section. 3. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble CIT(A) has erred