BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 40clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,921Delhi1,307Kolkata423Jaipur384Chennai295Ahmedabad257Bangalore218Pune160Hyderabad158Surat154Chandigarh152Indore118Karnataka114Raipur71Amritsar69Rajkot64Nagpur60Cochin59Visakhapatnam56Guwahati42Calcutta37Lucknow35Allahabad32Agra27Cuttack25Jodhpur21Patna10Ranchi10Telangana9SC6Varanasi5Panaji4Dehradun4Jabalpur3Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Disallowance4Addition to Income4Section 133(6)3Section 40A(3)3Section 44B2Section 69A2

MB PETROLEUM SERVICES LLC,MUMBAI vs. DDIT, DEHRADUN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1828/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun15 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshmb Petroleum Services Llc, Vs. Ddit, Kirtane & Pandit, H-16, Circle-1, Saraswati Colony, Sitaldevi International Taxation, Temple Road, Mahim, Dehradun Mumbai (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaecm2604H

For Appellant: Smt Shashi M. Kapila, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Mayank Kumar, JCIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 32Section 44B

section 44BB of the Act. 6. M/s. MB Petroleum Services LLC is a non-resident company incorporated under the laws of Oman, engaged in the business of providing services and facilities in connection with prospecting/ extraction/ production of mineral oil. The return of income was filed electronically for AY 2011-12 by the assessee on 30.09.2011 declaring loss

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN vs. STONEFIELD CONSTRUCTION, DEHRADUN, DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 215/DDN/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun08 Apr 2026AY 2023-24
Section 115BSection 133ASection 139Section 143(3)Section 250Section 250(2)Section 40A(3)Section 40aSection 69ASection 69C

bogus. 7. Before us, Ld. CIT DR for the Revenue submits that during the course of assessment proceedings, assessee has failed to prove the genuineness of the purchases made from these two parties and filed additional evidences before Ld. CIT(A) however, Ld. CIT(A) without waiting for the Remand Report from the AO has decided the issue in favour

ADIT, DEHRADUN vs. M/S. DAELIM INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD., DEHRADUN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 803/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun31 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri Mayank Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 44C

40,432/- Assessing Officer has disallowed the material cost claiming it to be bogus expenses, justifying that project was towards completion and there was no need of material purchase. How can an assessing Officer decide about business exigencies and expenses that needs to be incurred. 3 I.T.A. No. 803/Del/2012 Books of Accounts and vouchers were produced before the assessing officer

KOMA SINGHAL,DEHRADUN vs. DCIT/ACIT CEN CIR, DEHRADUN

In the result, Appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 59/DDN/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun06 Aug 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)

40,90,038/- after claiming exemption u/s LTCG. In order to substantiate the claim of the Assessee, the Assessee produced documentary evidences such as bills, vouchers, Calculation of Capital Gains, Copy of Sale and Purchase Deeds and the mode of payment of cost of improvements. 8. The only reason for rejecting the claim of the Assessee